Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36133796›Full record

ReviewOcean & coastal management2022

A decade of underwater noise research in support of the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive.

Nathan D Merchant, Rosalyn L Putland, Michel André, Eric Baudin, Mario Felli, Hans Slabbekoorn, René Dekeling

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ocean & coastal management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Should I stay, or should I go: Anthropogenic noises disrupt early recruitment of subarctic invertebrates.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathan D MerchantCentre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, UK.
Rosalyn L PutlandCentre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, UK.
Michel AndréLaboratory of Applied Bioacoustics, Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
Eric BaudinBureau Veritas, Paris La Défense, France.
Mario FelliInstitute of Marine Engineering (INM), National Research Council (CNR), Rome, Italy.
Hans SlabbekoornInstitute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
René DekelingSoundMarineNL, Den Haag, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Underwater noise from human activities is now widely recognised as a threat to marine life. Nevertheless, legislation which directly addresses this source of pollution is lacking. The first (and currently only) example globally is Descriptor 11 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), adopted by the European Union in 2008, which requires that levels of underwater noise pollution do not adversely affect marine ecosystems. The MSFD has stimulated a concerted research effort across Europe to develop noise monitoring programmes and to conduct research towards specifying threshold values which would define 'Good Environmental Status' (GES) for underwater noise. Here, we chart the progress made during the first decade of Descriptor 11's implementation: 2010-2020. Several international joint monitoring programmes have been established for impulsive and continuous noise, enabling ecosystem-scale assessment for the first time. Research into the impact of noise on individual animals has grown exponentially, demonstrating a range of adverse effects at various trophic levels. However, threshold values for GES must be defined for 'populations of marine animals.' Population-level consequences of noise exposure can be modelled, but data to parameterise such models are currently unavailable for most species, suggesting that alternative approaches to defining GES thresholds will be necessary. To date, the application of measures to reduce noise levels (quieting/noise abatement) has been limited. To address this, the EU in 2021 identified an explicit need to reduce underwater noise pollution in its waters. Delivering on this ambition will require further research focused on the development and implementation of quieting measures.

Indexed as

Joint monitoringMSFDNoise abatementPopulation consequencesUnderwater noise

Identifiers

PMID36133796
PMCPMC9472084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.