Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36133763›Full record

ArticleNanoscale advances2021

Carbon dots

Ping Wang, Mohammed J Meziani, Yingqiang Fu, Christopher E Bunker, Xiaofang Hou, Liju Yang, Hind Msellek, Melina Zaharias, Jasmine P Darby, Ya-Ping Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanoscale advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Carbon "quantum" dots for bioapplications.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ping WangDepartment of Chemistry and Laboratory for Emerging Materials and Technology, Clemson University Clemson South Carolina 29634 USA syaping@clemson.edu.
Mohammed J MezianiDepartment of Natural Sciences, Northwest Missouri State University Maryville Missouri 64468 USA meziani@nwmissouri.edu.
Yingqiang FuDepartment of Chemistry and Laboratory for Emerging Materials and Technology, Clemson University Clemson South Carolina 29634 USA syaping@clemson.edu.
Christopher E BunkerAir Force Research Laboratory, Propulsion Directorate, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Ohio 45433 USA christopher.bunker@wpafb.af.mil.
Xiaofang HouDepartment of Chemistry and Laboratory for Emerging Materials and Technology, Clemson University Clemson South Carolina 29634 USA syaping@clemson.edu.
Liju YangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Biomanufacturing Research Institute and Technology Enterprise, North Carolina Central University Durham NC 27707 USA lyang@nccu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4776-7597
Hind MsellekDepartment of Natural Sciences, Northwest Missouri State University Maryville Missouri 64468 USA meziani@nwmissouri.edu.
Melina ZahariasDepartment of Chemistry and Laboratory for Emerging Materials and Technology, Clemson University Clemson South Carolina 29634 USA syaping@clemson.edu.
Jasmine P DarbyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Biomanufacturing Research Institute and Technology Enterprise, North Carolina Central University Durham NC 27707 USA lyang@nccu.edu.
Ya-Ping SunDepartment of Chemistry and Laboratory for Emerging Materials and Technology, Clemson University Clemson South Carolina 29634 USA syaping@clemson.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8593-5769

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon dots (CDots) are defined as surface-passivated small carbon nanoparticles, with the effective passivation generally achieved by organic functionalization. Photoexcited CDots are both potent electron donors and acceptors, and their characteristic bright and colorful fluorescence emissions make them excellent fluorescence sensors for organic analytes and metal ions. For the latter extraordinarily low detection limits based on extremely efficient quenching of fluorescence intensities by the targeted metal cations have been observed and reported in the literature. However, all of the dot samples in those reported studies were made from "one-pot" carbonization of organic precursors mostly under rather mild processing conditions, unlikely to be sufficient for the required level of carbonization. Those dot samples should therefore be more appropriately considered as "nano-carbon/organic hybrids", characterized structurally as being highly porous and spongy, which must be playing a dominating role in the reported sensing results. In this study, we compared the dot samples from carbonization syntheses under similarly mild and also more aggressive processing conditions with the classically defined and structured CDots for the fluorescence sensing of copper(ii) cations in aqueous solutions. The observed dramatic decoupling between quenching results for fluorescence intensities and lifetimes of the carbonization samples, with the former being extraordinary and the latter within the diffusion controlled limit, suggested that the quenching of fluorescence intensities was greatly affected by the higher local quencher concentrations than the bulk associated with the porous and spongy sample structures, especially for the sample from carbonization under too mild processing conditions. The major differences between the classical CDots and the nano-carbon/organic hybrids are highlighted, and the tradeoffs between sensitivity and accuracy or reproducibility in the use of the latter for fluorescence sensing are discussed.

Identifiers

PMID36133763
PMCPMC9418061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.