Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36133672›Full record

ArticleHorticulture research2022

Precise exogenous insertion and sequence replacements in poplar by simultaneous HDR overexpression and NHEJ suppression using CRISPR-Cas9.

Ali Movahedi, Hui Wei, Xiaohong Zhou, Jake C Fountain, Zhong-Hua Chen, Zhiying Mu, Weibo Sun, Jiaxin Zhang, Dawei Li, Baozhu Guo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Horticulture research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Beyond a few bases: methods for large DNA insertion and gene targeting in plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CRISPR-Based Genome Editing and Its Applications in Woody Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Ali MovahediCollege of Biology and the Environment, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Key Laboratory of Forest Genetics & Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Hui WeiCollege of Biology and the Environment, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Key Laboratory of Forest Genetics & Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Xiaohong ZhouCollege of Forestry and Biotechnology, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China.
Jake C FountainDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.
Zhong-Hua ChenSchool of Science, Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
Zhiying MuCollege of Forestry and Biotechnology, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China.
Weibo SunCollege of Biology and the Environment, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Key Laboratory of Forest Genetics & Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Jiaxin ZhangSchool of Food Science and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China.
Dawei LiCollege of Biology and the Environment, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Key Laboratory of Forest Genetics & Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Baozhu GuoUSDA-ARS, Crop Genetics and Breeding Research Unit, Tifton, GA 31793, USA.
Rajeev K VarshneyCenter of Excellence in Genomics & Systems Biology, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad 502324, India.
Liming YangCollege of Biology and the Environment, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Key Laboratory of Forest Genetics & Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Qiang ZhugeCollege of Biology and the Environment, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Key Laboratory of Forest Genetics & Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Nanjing Forestry University · CNZhejiang A & F University · CNAgricultural Research Service · USMississippi State University · USMurdoch University · AUNanjing Normal University · CNWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-mediated genome editing has become a powerful tool for the genetic modification of biological traits. However, developing an efficient, site-specific, gene knock-in system based on homology-directed DNA repair (HDR) remains a significant challenge in plants, especially in woody species like poplar. Here, we show that simultaneous inhibition of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) recombination cofactor XRCC4 and overexpression of HDR enhancer factors CtIP and MRE11 can improve HDR efficiency for gene knock-in. Using this approach, the

Identifiers

PMID36133672
PMCPMC9478684
OpenAlexW3171000988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.