Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36133293›Full record

ReviewNanoscale advances2021

A review on the cytotoxicity of graphene quantum dots: from experiment to simulation.

Lijun Liang, Xiangming Peng, Fangfang Sun, Zhe Kong, Jia-Wei Shen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanoscale advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Lijun LiangCollege of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University Hangzhou 310018 People's Republic of China zhekong@hdu.edu.cn +86 571 87951895.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3753-1107
Xiangming PengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, GuangZhou Red Cross Hospital 396 Tongfu Zhong Road Guangzhou 510220 GuangDong China.
Fangfang SunCollege of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University Hangzhou 310018 People's Republic of China zhekong@hdu.edu.cn +86 571 87951895.
Zhe KongCenter of Advanced Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, College of Materials and Environmental Engineering, Hangzhou Dianzi University Hangzhou 310018 People's Republic of China.
Jia-Wei ShenSchool of Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University Hangzhou 311121 People's Republic of China shen.jiawei@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4020-4062
Hangzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNHangzhou Normal University · CNRed Cross Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphene quantum dots (GQDs) generate intrinsic fluorescence and improve the aqueous stability of graphene oxide (GO) while maintaining wide chemical adaptability and high adsorption capacity. Despite GO's remarkable advantages in bio-imaging, bio-sensing, and other biomedical applications, many experiments and simulations have focused on the biosafety of GQDs. Here, we review the findings on the biosafety of GQDs from experiments; then, we review the results from simulated interactions with biological membranes, DNA molecules, and proteins; finally, we examine the intersection between experiments and simulations. The biosafety results from simulations are explained in detail. Based on the literature and our experiments, we also discuss the trends toward GQDs with better biosafety.

Identifiers

PMID36133293
PMCPMC9419276
OpenAlexW3117617990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.