Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36133149›Full record

ReviewRoyal Society open science2022

Defence mitigation by predators of chemically defended prey integrated over the predation sequence and across biological levels with a focus on cardiotonic steroids.

Shabnam Mohammadi, Lu Yang, Matthew Bulbert, Hannah M Rowland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Royal Society open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evolutionary insights into NaBMC ecology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Identification of the NAJournal of chemical ecology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shabnam MohammadiSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3450-6424
Lu YangWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Matthew BulbertDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7313-2536
Hannah M RowlandMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1040-555X

Funding

Epistasis as a source of contingency in the adaptive evolution of protein functionF32HL149172 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI MOHAMMADI, SHABNAM · 2019 to 2021
$155k
NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL149172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predator-prey interactions have long served as models for the investigation of adaptation and fitness in natural environments. Anti-predator defences such as mimicry and camouflage provide some of the best examples of evolution. Predators, in turn, have evolved sensory systems, cognitive abilities and physiological resistance to prey defences. In contrast to prey defences which have been reviewed extensively, the evolution of predator counter-strategies has received less attention. To gain a comprehensive view of how prey defences can influence the evolution of predator counter-strategies, it is essential to investigate how and when selection can operate. In this review we evaluate how predators overcome prey defences during (i) encounter, (ii) detection, (iii) identification, (iv) approach, (v) subjugation, and (vi) consumption. We focus on prey that are protected by cardiotonic steroids (CTS)-defensive compounds that are found in a wide range of taxa, and that have a specific physiological target. In this system, coevolution is well characterized between specialist insect herbivores and their host plants but evidence for coevolution between CTS-defended prey and their predators has received less attention. Using the predation sequence framework, we organize 574 studies reporting predators overcoming CTS defences, integrate these counter-strategies across biological levels of organization, and discuss the costs and benefits of attacking CTS-defended prey. We show that distinct lineages of predators have evolved dissecting behaviour, changes in perception of risk and of taste perception, and target-site insensitivity. We draw attention to biochemical, hormonal and microbiological strategies that have yet to be investigated as predator counter-adaptations to CTS defences. We show that the predation sequence framework will be useful for organizing future studies of chemically mediated systems and coevolution.

Indexed as

arms racebufadenolidescardenolidescardiotonic streroidspredation

Identifiers

PMID36133149
PMCPMC9449480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.