Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36133043›Full record

ReviewNanoscale advances2020

Deep learning: a new tool for photonic nanostructure design.

Ravi S Hegde

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanoscale advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Photonic Nanomaterials for Wearable Health Solutions.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Advancing materials science through next-generation machine learning.Current opinion in solid state & materials science · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. A deep neural network for general scattering matrix.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  14. Transfer Learning for Modeling Plasmonic Nanowire Waveguides.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Deep learning in light-matter interactions.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ravi S HegdeAB 6/212, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar Gujarat 382355 India hegder@iitgn.ac.in +91 79 2395 2486.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0418-5861

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early results have shown the potential of Deep Learning (DL) to disrupt the fields of optical inverse-design, particularly, the inverse design of nanostructures. In the last three years, the complexity of the optical nanostructure being designed and the sophistication of the employed DL methodology have steadily increased. This topical review comprehensively surveys DL based design examples from the nanophotonics literature. Notwithstanding the early success of this approach, its limitations, range of validity and its place among established design techniques remain to be assessed. The review also provides a perspective on the limitations of this approach and emerging research directions. It is hoped that this topical review may help readers to identify unaddressed problems, to choose an initial setup for a specific problem, and, to identify means to improve the performance of existing DL based workflows.

Identifiers

PMID36133043
PMCPMC9417537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.