ReviewNanoscale advances2022
Novel insights into nanomaterials for immunomodulatory bone regeneration.
Review in Nanoscale advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Attapulgite Nanocomposites for Cartilage and Osteochondral Repair: Material-Tissue Matching, Evidence-Graded Mechanisms and Translation.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- An immunomodulatory bioactive glass orchestrates early bone healing via coordinated macrophage polarization and osteogenesis-osteolysis balance.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Recent progress of 3D printed responsive scaffolds for bone repair: A review.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Evolution in Bone Tissue Regeneration: From Grafts to Innovative Biomaterials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Bone-derived nanoparticles (BNPs) enhance osteogenic differentiationNanoscale advances · 2025Article
- Mussel-inspired immunomodulatory and osteoinductive dual-functional hydroxyapatite nanoplatform for promoting bone regeneration.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Article
- Engineering antibacterial bioceramics: Design principles and mechanisms of action.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Engineering mesoporous bioactive glasses for emerging stimuli-responsive drug delivery and theranostic applications.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Light-controlled morphological development of self-organizing bioinspired nanocomposites.Nanoscale · 2024Article
- Osteoimmune Properties of Mesoporous Bioactive Nanospheres: A Study on T Helper Lymphocytes.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Delivery and Activation of Growth Factors Using Nanomaterials for Bone Repair.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Titanium Implant Surface Effects on Adherent Macrophage Phenotype: A Systematic Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Review
- Surface Engineering of Nanomaterials with Polymers, Biomolecules, and Small Ligands for Nanomedicine.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone defect repair caused by trauma, congenital malformation, tumors, infection or systemic diseases remains the focus of attention in regeneration medicine. Recent advances in osteoimmunology indicate that immune cells and correlative cytokines modulate the delicate balance between osteoblasts and osteoclasts and induce a favorable microenvironment for bone regeneration. With superior attributes that imitate the three-dimensional architecture of natural bone, excellent fabricability, mechanical and biological properties, nanomaterials (NMs) are becoming attractive in the field of bone tissue engineering. Particularly, it could be an effective strategy for immunomodulatory bone regeneration by engineering NMs involved in composition nature, nanoarchitectural morphology, surface chemistry, topography and biological molecules, whose mechanisms potentially refer to regulating the phenotype of high-plastic immune cells and inducing cytokine secretion to accelerate osteogenesis. Despite these prominent achievements, the employment of NMs is poorly translated into clinical trials due to the lack of knowledge about the interaction between NMs and the immune system. For this reason, we sketch out the hierarchical structure of bone and its natural healing process, followed by discussion about the effects of immune cells on bone regeneration. Novel horizons focusing on recent progressions in the architectural and physicochemical performances of NMs and their impacts on the body defence mechanism are also emphasized, hoping to provide novel insights for the fabrication of bone graft materials in tissue engineering.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.