ArticleNanoscale advances2021
Advanced analysis of magnetic nanoflower measurements to leverage their use in biomedicine.
Article in Nanoscale advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Magnetic Moment to Magnetic Particle Imaging: A Comprehensive Review on MPI Technology, Tracer Design and Biological Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Nanoparticle retention enables non-invasive detection of metastases by magnetic particle imaging in murine breast cancer models.Theranostics · 2026Article
- Ranking Magnetic Colloid Performance for Magnetic Particle Imaging and Magnetic Particle Hyperthermia.Advanced functional materials · 2025Article
- Magnetic Particle Imaging-Guided Thermal Simulations for Magnetic Particle Hyperthermia.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Influence of the hierarchical architecture of multi-core iron oxide nanoflowers on their magnetic properties.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Robust approaches for model-free small-angle scattering data analysis.Journal of applied crystallography · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic nanoparticles are an important asset in many biomedical applications ranging from the local heating of tumours to targeted drug delivery towards diseased sites. Recently, magnetic nanoflowers showed a remarkable heating performance in hyperthermia experiments thanks to their complex structure leading to a broad range of magnetic dynamics. To grasp their full potential and to better understand the origin of this unexpected heating performance, we propose the use of Kaczmarz' algorithm in interpreting magnetic characterisation measurements. It has the advantage that no
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.