ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
The Application of Focused Care Model in the Management of Hepatitis B Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital and the Impact on Patients' Quality of Life.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of different intervention methods on psychological flexibility, negative emotions and sleep quality in chronic hepatitis B.World journal of psychiatry · 2023Article
- Retracted: The Application of Focused Care Model in the Management of Hepatitis B Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital and the Impact on Patients' Quality of Life.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-06-28Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Human Subject Welfare · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic hepatitis B is one of the common infectious diseases in the world, with a wide epidemic range and strong contagiousness, which is difficult to completely eradicate. From July 2020 to April 2022, 142 patients with hepatitis B who were admitted to tertiary hospitals were selected and randomly divided into 2 cases, with 71 cases per case. The control group adopts a conventional model, and the observation group implements a nursing model based on the control group. The management capacity and quality of life before and after the two groups of care were compared. 94 patients with chronic hepatitis B who were admitted to the hospital from July 2020 to April 2022 were selected, and 47 cases were divided into the control group and observation group according to the admission time. The control group is given a conventional model, and the observation group is given a nursing model on the basis of the control group. Both groups of patients observed anxiety self-assessment scale (SAS), depression self-assessment scale (SDS), short life span scale (SF-36) scores, and treatment conditions before and after the intervention, to explore the application of nursing model in the management of hepatitis B patients in tertiary hospitals and its impact on patient quality of life. Based on study's precare outcomes, there was no statistically significant difference between the self-administered scale (PIH) score and the quality of life measurement summary scale (QOL-BREF) score (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.