Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36132245›Full record

ArticleNanoscale advances2019

A technique-driven materials categorisation scheme to support regulatory identification of nanomaterials.

Claire Gaillard, Agnieszka Mech, Wendel Wohlleben, Frank Babick, Vasile-Dan Hodoroaba, Antoine Ghanem, Stefan Weigel, Hubert Rauscher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanoscale advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. In situ cryo-ET visualization of mitochondrial depolarization and mitophagic engulfment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claire GaillardEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre 21027 Ispra (VA) Italy hubert.rauscher@ec.europa.eu.
Agnieszka MechEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre 21027 Ispra (VA) Italy hubert.rauscher@ec.europa.eu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5544-4029
Wendel WohllebenBASF SE, Material Physics Research 67056 Ludwigshafen Germany.
Frank BabickTechnische Universität Dresden, Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Dresden Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5958-2111
Vasile-Dan HodoroabaFederal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM) 12205 Berlin Germany.
Antoine GhanemSolvay - Research & Innovation Centre Brussels 1120 Brussels Belgium.
Stefan WeigelRIKILT - Wageningen UR 6708 Wageningen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4197-5758
Hubert RauscherEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre 21027 Ispra (VA) Italy hubert.rauscher@ec.europa.eu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1850-0164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide there is a variety of regulatory provisions addressing nanomaterials. The identification as nanomaterial in a regulatory context often has the consequence that specific legal rules apply. In identifying nanomaterials, and to find out whether nanomaterial-specific provisions apply, the external size of particles is globally used as a criterion. For legal certainty, its assessment for regulatory purposes should be based on measurements and methods that are robust, fit for the purpose and ready to be accepted by different stakeholders and authorities. This should help to assure the safety of nanomaterials and at the same time facilitate their international trading. Therefore, we propose a categorisation scheme which is driven by the capabilities of common characterisation techniques for particle size measurement. Categorising materials according to this scheme takes into account the particle properties that are most important for a determination of their size. The categorisation is exemplified for the specific particle number based size metric of the European Commission's recommendation on the definition of nanomaterial, but it is applicable to other metrics as well. Matching the performance profiles of the measurement techniques with the material property profiles (i) allows selecting the most appropriate size determination technique for every type of material considered, (ii) enables proper identification of nanomaterials, and (iii) has the potential to be accepted by regulators, industry and consumers alike. Having such a scheme in place would facilitate the regulatory assessment of nanomaterials in regional legislation as well as in international relations between different regulatory regions assuring the safe trade of nanomaterials.

Identifiers

PMID36132245
PMCPMC9473175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.