ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Analysis of the influencing factors on fine-needle aspiration biopsy results of the thyroid.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The clinical value of repeat ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the management of Bethesda Category III thyroid nodules.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic yield of fine needle aspiration with simultaneous core needle biopsy for thyroid nodules.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of the study is to analyze the influencing factors on the results of thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Method: A total of 339 patients who underwent FNAB in our hospital from December 2018 to July 2021 were retrospectively selected. The patients were chosen according to the gender ratio, age, and thyroid ultrasound characteristics and were divided into three groups: (1) a 22G needle vacuum aspiration group (Group 1, Results: The specimen dissatisfaction rates of the three groups were 22/85 (25.9%), 15/50 (30%), and 18/186 (9.7%), respectively. The overall sample dissatisfaction rate was 55/339 (16.2%), and the sample satisfaction rate of Group 3 was higher than that of Groups 1 and 2 ( Conclusion: A 25G capillary sampling aspiration biopsy needle was selected to perform FNAB in thyroid nodules without vacuum aspiration, which could effectively improve the accuracy of FNAB results with a high specimen satisfaction rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.