Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36132188›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2022

'Labour Hopscotch': Women's evaluation of using the steps during labor.

Lorraine Carroll, Sinead Thompson, Barbara Coughlan, Teresa McCreery, Aisling Murphy, Jean Doherty, Lucille Sheehy, Martina Cronin, Mary Brosnan, Denise O'Brien

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of midwifery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07330557 (Effect of the Labour Hopscotch Method on the Labor Process and Maternal Satisfaction), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07330557 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of the Labour Hopscotch Method on the Labor Process and Maternal Satisfaction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAydin Adnan Menderes UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled110ConditionsLabor Duration, Labor Bain, and Birth Satisfaction During Physiologic Vaginal BirthArmsLabor Hopscotch Exercise Program Group, Standard Intrapartum Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lorraine CarrollSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Sinead ThompsonNational Women and Infants Health Programme, Dublin, Ireland.
Barbara CoughlanSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Teresa McCreeryNational Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Aisling MurphySchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jean DohertyNational Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Lucille SheehyNational Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Martina CroninNational Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Mary BrosnanNational Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Denise O'BrienSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
National Maternity Hospital · IEUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionConcerns have been expressed globally about the decline in rates of physiological birth and rising intervention rates during labor and birth. The 'Labour Hopscotch' Framework, a visual depiction of steps required to remain active during labor was implemented in a large tertiary maternity hospital in Ireland. The aim of this study was to evaluate the steps of the Labour Hopscotch women found most useful, examine the use of non-pharmacological and pharmacological methods of pain relief used during labor and finally to investigate the labor and birth outcomes of women who used 'Labour Hopscotch' during labor.

methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using a study specific questionnaire.

resultsA total of 809 women completed the questionnaire. The Labour Hopscotch Framework was positively evaluated. Mobilizing, the birthing ball, birthing stool, and water therapy were found to be the most useful steps. Primiparous women were more likely to use non-pharmacological methods of pain relief. Pharmacological methods used by women were entonox (67.5%), pethidine (8%) and epidural analgesia (38.5%). Primiparous women were more likely to have epidural analgesia than multiparous women (p<0.00001). Women that attended either private (p=0.004) or public-led obstetric (p=0.005) antenatal care were more likely to have epidural analgesia in labor. Women attending the community midwives were least likely to receive epidural analgesia during labor. The rates of spontaneous vaginal birth, assisted birth and cesarean section, were 77.1%, 14% and 8.7%, respectively.

conclusionsOur study findings contribute to the increasing national and international evidence that initiatives such as Labour Hopscotch can promote and advocate for women to be active and mobile during labor to support physiological birth.

Indexed as

active birthinnovationmaternity researchmidwiferymodels of carenormal birth

Identifiers

PMID36132188
PMCPMC9460932
OpenAlexW4295222584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.