ArticleHeliyon2022
Fellowship and future career plans for orthopedic trainees: gender-based differences in influencing factors.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing characteristics and perspectives of U.S. anesthesiology fellows in training and anesthesiologists in their first year of practice.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Gender Diversity in Sports Medicine: Current Trends.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Gender gap-Gender-specific development in the field of obstetrics and gynecology in Germany in the last 20 years.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Orthopaedic Fellowship Match: How Do Degree and Gender Type Affect Match Success?JB & JS open accessReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Understanding gender-based preferences and factors influencing fellowship and subspecialty choice might help maximize gender diversity in orthopedic surgery. This study aims to identify the differences between male and female orthopedic trainees' future career plans. It also examines the factors and determinants that influence selection of fellowship specialties in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This cross-sectional multicenter study recruited orthopedic surgical trainees from multiple training centers. The survey was completed by 270 participants; 20 residents were excluded because they were unsure of their future career interests or preferred fellowships in general orthopedic practice. The participants were either postgraduate orthopedic residents or fellows who already enrolled in postgraduate residency and/or fellowship training program. A total of 201 (80% of 250 participants) were male and 49 (20%) were female. Results: The orthopedic subspecialities and fellowship preferences and their influencing factors varied considerably across genders. Pediatric orthopedics and hand and upper extremity were top sub-specialties preferences among women while arthroscopy and sports medicine, arthroplasty, and trauma were the top preferences among men. Women preferred to practice single subspeciality while men preferred to do multiple fellowships and practiced different orthopedic subspecialities. The expected income, private-sector job opportunities, and hospital needs were the most significant factors influencing subspecialty and future career preferences among men while personal interest and social and family commitments were the most influential factors for women. Conclusions: This study addresses the knowledge gap regarding gender-based subspecialty preferences and the factors influencing them. The results can inform strategy development for addressing women's needs and interests in orthopedic surgery as well as the shortages of orthopedic surgeons in some subspecialties. Furthermore, these data may assist directors of training centers in analyzing expected future demands on fellowship training programs and addressing the training gap in all subspecialties and career counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.