Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36132135›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022

Immunotherapy in advanced kidney cancer: an alternative meta-analytic method using reconstructed survival data in case of proportional hazard assumption violation.

Luigi Nocera, Giuseppe Fallara, Daniele Raggi, Federico Belladelli, Daniele Robesti, Francesco Montorsi, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Bernard Malavaud, Guillaume Ploussard, Andrea Necchi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Luigi NoceraDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe FallaraDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Daniele RaggiDepartment of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Federico BelladelliDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Daniele RobestiDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Francesco MontorsiDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Pierre I KarakiewiczCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Bernard MalavaudDepartment of Urology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse - Oncopôle, Toulouse, France.
Guillaume PloussardDepartment of Urology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse - Oncopôle, Toulouse, France.
Andrea NecchiDepartment of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Alberto MartiniDepartment of Urology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse - Oncopôle, Toulouse, France.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITInstitut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole · FRIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San RaffaeleLyon Genou Centre Albert Trillat · FRUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With the advent of immuno-oncology compounds in randomized trials, we observe more and more survival curves crossing. From a statistical standpoint this corresponds to violation of the proportional hazard assumption. When this occurs, the hazard ratio from the Cox regression is not reliable as an estimate. Herein, we aimed to identify the most appropriate IO-based therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma applying an alternative method to overcome the issue of hazard assumption violation for meta-analyses. Methods: Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched. Only phase III randomized clinical trials on IO-IO (nivo-ipi) or IO-TKI combinations were included. An algorithm to obtain survival data from published Kaplan-Meier curves was used to reconstruct data on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DoR). Differences in restricted mean survival time (RMST) were used for comparisons. Results: individual survival data from 4,206 patients from five trials were reconciled. Patients who received nivo-ipi or IO-TKI had better OS, PFS and DoR relative to sunitinib (all p<0.001). Patients who received IO-TKI had similar OS and PFS relative to nivo-ipi, with a 36-month ΔRMST of -0.55 (95% CI: -1.71-0.60; p=0.3) and -1.5 (95% CI: -2.9-0.0; p=0.051) months, respectively. Regarding DoR, patients who received nivo-ipi had longer duration of response relative to IO-TKI, with a 24-month ΔRMST of 1.5 (95% CI: 0.2-2.8; p=0.02) months. Conclusion: Despite overall similar OS and PFS for patients receiving nivo-ipi and IO-TKI combinations, DoR was more favorable in patients who received nivo-ipi compared to IO-TKI. A meta-analysis based on differences in RMST is a useful alternative whenever the proportional hazard assumption is violated.

Indexed as

duration of response (DoR)individual patient data (IPD)metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)overall survival (OS)progression-free survival (PFS)reconstructed data

Identifiers

PMID36132135
PMCPMC9483094
OpenAlexW4294628947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.