Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36132057›Full record

ArticleRadiology case reports2022

Schwannoma mimicking ovarian malignancy.

Inês Conde Vasco, Gonçalo Martins Pereira, Joana Ferreira, Teresa Margarida Cunha

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Inês Conde VascoDepartment of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Rua da Beneficência 8, 1069-166 Lisbon, Portugal.
Gonçalo Martins PereiraDepartment of Pathology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, R. Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisbon, Portugal.
Joana FerreiraDepartment of Pathology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, R. Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisbon, Portugal.
Teresa Margarida CunhaDepartment of Radiology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, R. Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisbon, Portugal.
Unidade Local de Saúde de São José · PTUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we present a case of retroperitoneal schwannoma localized in the pelvic cavity mimicking ovarian carcinoma. A 60-year-old woman presented with a feeling of pelvic heaviness and dyspareunia for 3 months. On physical examination, a hardened mass is palpated on the cul-de-sac of Douglas, measuring approximately 10 cm. The sonographic study showed a retro-uterine solid mass, containing cystic areas, measuring 14 cm. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a solid left tumor in the small pelvis, posterior to the uterus, suspicious of an ovarian malign tumor. Surgery revealed a retroperitoneal pelvic tumor and uterus and adnexa without macroscopic changes. Pathology examination of the pelvic mass confirmed the diagnosis of schwannoma. In the present case, it is emphasized that it is easy to misdiagnose a pelvic mass as an ovarian tumor. While prompt recognition of ovarian cancer remains essential, awareness of processes that mimic ovarian tumors can avoid potential misdiagnosis. The pelvis has a complex anatomy and there are some imaging signs that help assessing the origin of a mass, especially in cases of masses abutting the ovary.

Indexed as

Ovarian tumorPelvic anatomyPelvic massRetroperitoneal schwannomaSchwannoma

Identifiers

PMID36132057
PMCPMC9483596
OpenAlexW4295678033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.