Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36131994›Full record

ArticleBiological invasions2022

GIRAE: a generalised approach for linking the total impact of invasion to species' range, abundance and per-unit effects.

Guillaume Latombe, Jane A Catford, Franz Essl, Bernd Lenzner, David M Richardson, John R U Wilson, Melodie A McGeoch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological invasions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The impacts of biological invasions.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Guillaume LatombeInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, The University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, EH9 3FL Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8589-8387
Jane A CatfordDepartment of Geography, King's College London, 30 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4BG UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0582-5960
Franz EsslBioinvasions, Global Change, Macroecology Group, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8253-2112
Bernd LenznerBioinvasions, Global Change, Macroecology Group, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2616-3479
David M RichardsonCentre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9574-8297
John R U WilsonCentre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0174-3239
Melodie A McGeochDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Evolution, LaTrobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086 Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3388-2241
Stellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of Vienna · ATLa Trobe University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 4011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The total impact of an alien species was conceptualised as the product of its range size, local abundance and per-unit effect in a seminal paper by Parker et al. (Biol Invasions 1:3-19, 1999). However, a practical approach for estimating the three components has been lacking. Here, we generalise the impact formula and, through use of regression models, estimate the relationship between the three components of impact, an approach we term GIRAE (Generalised Impact = Range size × Abundance × per-unit Effect). We discuss how GIRAE can be applied to multiple types of impact, including environmental impacts, damage and management costs. We propose two methods for applying GIRAE. The species-specific method computes the relationship between impact, range size, abundance and per-unit effect for a given species across multiple invaded sites or regions of different sizes. The multi-species method combines data from multiple species across multiple sites or regions to calculate a per-unit effect for each species and is computed using a single regression model. The species-specific method is more accurate, but it requires a large amount of data for each species and assumes a constant per-unit effect for a species across the invaded area. The multi-species method is more easily applicable and data-parsimonious, but assumes the same relationship between impact, range size and abundance for all considered species. We illustrate these methods using data about money spent managing plant invasions in different biomes of South Africa. We found clear differences between species in terms of money spent per unit area invaded, with per-unit expenditure varying substantially between biomes for some species-insights that are useful for monitoring and evaluating management. GIRAE offers a versatile and practical method that can be applied to many different types of data to better understand and manage the impacts of biological invasions. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10530-022-02836-0.

Indexed as

AbundanceBiological invasionsImpactInvasive alien plant speciesOccupancySouth AfricaVegetation management

Identifiers

PMID36131994
PMCPMC9482606
OpenAlexW4281956645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.