ArticleNanoscale advances2021
Cell-imprinted substrates: in search of nanotopographical fingerprints that guide stem cell differentiation.
Article in Nanoscale advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell-imprinted substrates as biomimetic platforms for osteoarthritis modeling with mesenchymal stem cells.BioImpacts : BI · 2025Article
- Directed Differentiation of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Using Imprinted Cell-Like Topographies as a Growth Factor-Free Approach.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2024Review
- Insight into the role of integrins and integrins-targeting biomaterials in bone regeneration.Connective tissue research · 2024Review
- Regulation of cell fate by cell imprinting approach in vitro.BioImpacts : BI · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell-imprinted substrates direct stem cell differentiation into various lineages, suggesting the idea of lineage-specific nanotopography. We herein examined the surface topography of five different imprinted cell patterns using AFM imaging and statistical analysis of amplitude, spatial, and hybrid roughness parameters. The results suggest that different cell imprints possess distinguished nanotopographical features.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.