Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36131677›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2023

Fish and macroinvertebrate assemblages reveal extensive degradation of the world's rivers.

Maria João Feio, Robert M Hughes, Sónia R Q Serra, Susan J Nichols, Ben J Kefford, Mark Lintermans, Wayne Robinson, Oghenekaro N Odume, Marcos Callisto, Diego R Macedo and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Bending the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss: what are the prospects?Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Maria João FeioDepartment of Life Sciences, Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ARNET, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0362-6802
Robert M HughesAmnis Opes Institute, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1308-666X
Sónia R Q SerraDepartment of Life Sciences, Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ARNET, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4426-465X
Susan J NicholsCentre for Applied Water Science, Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3553-8009
Ben J KeffordCentre for Applied Water Science, Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6789-4254
Mark LintermansCentre for Applied Water Science, Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2369-0932
Wayne RobinsonCharles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8793-7466
Oghenekaro N OdumeUnilever Centre for Environmental Water Quality, Institute for Water Research, Rhodes University, Makhanda, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5220-3254
Marcos CallistoDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2341-4700
Diego R MacedoDepartamento de Geografia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1178-4969
Jon S HardingSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1070-1594
Adam G YatesDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2239-9046
Wendy MonkEnvironment and Climate Change Canada and Canadian Rivers Institute, Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9031-5433
Keigo NakamuraJapan Riverfront Research Center, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8905-9719
Terutaka MoriAqua Restoration Research Center, Public Works Research Institute, Kakamigahara, Gifu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9203-5168
Masanao SueyoshiAqua Restoration Research Center, Public Works Research Institute, Kakamigahara, Gifu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5517-0256
Norman Mercado-SilvaCentro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7764-8161
Kai ChenDepartment of Entomology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5332-5920
Min Jeong BaekNational Institute of Biological Resources, Ministry of Environment, Incheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0101-2065
Yeon Jae BaeDivision of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7810-5409
Ram Devi Tachamo-ShahDepartment of Life Sciences, School of Science, Aquatic Ecology Centre, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1061-2903
Deep Narayan ShahCentral Department of Environmental Science, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8436-7560
Ian CampbellRhithroecology, Blackburn South, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9306-3884
Nabor MoyaInstituto Experimental de Biologia, Universidad Mayor Real y Pontificia de San Francisco Xavier de Chuquisaca, Sucre, Bolivia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8464-2008
Francis O ArimoroApplied Hydrobiology Unit, Department of Animal Biology, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6100-4011
Unique N KekeApplied Hydrobiology Unit, Department of Animal Biology, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9528-0599
Renato T MartinsCoordenação de Biodiversidade, Curso de pós-graduação em Entomologia, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3464-7905
Carlos B M AlvesLaboratório Nuvelhas, Projeto Manuelzão, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1731-6541
Paulo S PompeuDepartamento de Ecologia e Conservação, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7938-1517
Subodh SharmaAquatic Ecology Centre, School of Science, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3754-0716

Funding

Australian Research Council LP160100093Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/04292/2020Fundações de Amparo à Pesquisa de Minas Gerais e Amazonas
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rivers suffer from multiple stressors acting simultaneously on their biota, but the consequences are poorly quantified at the global scale. We evaluated the biological condition of rivers globally, including the largest proportion of countries from the Global South published to date. We gathered macroinvertebrate- and fish-based assessments from 72,275 and 37,676 sites, respectively, from 64 study regions across six continents and 45 nations. Because assessments were based on differing methods, different systems were consolidated into a 3-class system: Good, Impaired, or Severely Impaired, following common guidelines. The proportion of sites in each class by study area was calculated and each region was assigned a Köppen-Geiger climate type, Human Footprint score (addressing landscape alterations), Human Development Index (HDI) score (addressing social welfare), % rivers with good ambient water quality, % protected freshwater key biodiversity areas; and % of forest area net change rate. We found that 50% of macroinvertebrate sites and 42% of fish sites were in Good condition, whereas 21% and 29% were Severely Impaired, respectively. The poorest biological conditions occurred in Arid and Equatorial climates and the best conditions occurred in Snow climates. Severely Impaired conditions were associated (Pearson correlation coefficient) with higher HDI scores, poorer physico-chemical water quality, and lower proportions of protected freshwater areas. Good biological conditions were associated with good water quality and increased forested areas. It is essential to implement statutory bioassessment programs in Asian, African, and South American countries, and continue them in Oceania, Europe, and North America. There is a need to invest in assessments based on fish, as there is less information globally and fish were strong indicators of degradation. Our study highlights a need to increase the extent and number of protected river catchments, preserve and restore natural forested areas in the catchments, treat wastewater discharges, and improve river connectivity.

Indexed as

EcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringAnimalsBiodiversityFishesHumansInvertebratesRiversWater Qualityanthropogenic degradationbiological assessmentclimatehuman developmenthuman footprintprotected areasstreams

Identifiers

PMID36131677
PMCPMC10091732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.