Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36131515›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Robust and Efficient Online Auditory Psychophysics.

Sijia Zhao, Christopher A Brown, Lori L Holt, Frederic Dick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Auditory Category Learning in Children With Dyslexia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sijia ZhaoDepartment of Experimental Psychology, 6396University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6246-0702
Christopher A BrownDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, 6614University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Lori L HoltDepartment of Psychology, 6612Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Frederic DickDepartment of Psychological Sciences, 4894Birkbeck College, University of London, London, UK.

Funding

Dimension-based auditory selective attentionR01DC017734 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HOLT, LORI L · 2020 to 2024
$2.6M
Modifying spatial maps to improve localizationR21DC018408 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BROWN, CHRISTOPHER A · 2020 to 2021
$416k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017734NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC018408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most human auditory psychophysics research has historically been conducted in carefully controlled environments with calibrated audio equipment, and over potentially hours of repetitive testing with expert listeners. Here, we operationally define such conditions as having high 'auditory hygiene'. From this perspective, conducting auditory psychophysical paradigms online presents a serious challenge, in that results may hinge on absolute sound presentation level, reliably estimated perceptual thresholds, low and controlled background noise levels, and sustained motivation and attention. We introduce a set of procedures that address these challenges and facilitate auditory hygiene for online auditory psychophysics. First, we establish a simple means of setting sound presentation levels. Across a set of four level-setting conditions conducted in person, we demonstrate the stability and robustness of this level setting procedure in open air and controlled settings. Second, we test participants' tone-in-noise thresholds using widely adopted online experiment platforms and demonstrate that reliable threshold estimates can be derived online in approximately one minute of testing. Third, using these level and threshold setting procedures to establish participant-specific stimulus conditions, we show that an online implementation of the classic probe-signal paradigm can be used to demonstrate frequency-selective attention on an individual-participant basis, using a third of the trials used in recent in-lab experiments. Finally, we show how threshold and attentional measures relate to well-validated assays of online participants' in-task motivation, fatigue, and confidence. This demonstrates the promise of online auditory psychophysics for addressing new auditory perception and neuroscience questions quickly, efficiently, and with more diverse samples. Code for the tests is publicly available through Pavlovia and Gorilla.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionNoiseAuditory ThresholdHumansPsychophysicsauditory thresholdsmotivationonline testingprobe-signalpsychophysics

Identifiers

PMID36131515
PMCPMC9500270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.