Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36131304›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2022

"It's all about asking from those who have walked the path": Patient and stakeholder perspectives on how peers may shift substance use stigma in HIV care in South Africa.

Jessica F Magidson, Alexandra L Rose, Kristen S Regenauer, Carrie Brooke-Sumner, Morgan S Anvari, Helen E Jack, Kim Johnson, Jennifer M Belus, John Joska, Ingrid V Bassett and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Jessica F MagidsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, 4094 Campus Drive, College Park, Maryland, MD, USA. jmagidso@umd.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3513-3255
Alexandra L RoseDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, 4094 Campus Drive, College Park, Maryland, MD, USA.
Kristen S RegenauerDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, 4094 Campus Drive, College Park, Maryland, MD, USA.
Carrie Brooke-SumnerAlcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Parow, South Africa.
Morgan S AnvariDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, 4094 Campus Drive, College Park, Maryland, MD, USA.
Helen E JackDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kim JohnsonAlcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Parow, South Africa.
Jennifer M BelusDepartment of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
John JoskaHIV Mental Health Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ingrid V BassettDivision of Infectious Diseases, Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Goodman SibekoHIV Mental Health Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Bronwyn MyersAlcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Parow, South Africa. bronwyn.myers-franchi@curtin.edu.au.
University of Maryland, College Park · USSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Cape Town · ZAHarvard University · USUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Practice facilitation and supervision to strengthen depression treatment in primary care in ZimbabweK23MH129420 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Helen Elizabeth Jack · 2022 to 2026
$922k
Training CHWs to Support Re-Engagement in TB/HIV Care in the Context of Depression and Substance UseR34MH122268 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MAGIDSON, JESSICA F, MYERS, BRONWYN · 2020 to 2022
$606k
Evaluating the Role of Peers to Reduce Substance Use Stigma and Improve HIV Care Outcomes in South AfricaR21DA053212 · NIDA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MAGIDSON, JESSICA F, MYERS, BRONWYN · 2020 to 2021
$372k
Effectiveness and implementation of pre-training interpersonal skills assessment of community health workers in South Africa to predict post-training competence in mental health careF31MH123020 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI ROSE, ALEXANDRA LEAH · 2021 to 2023
$127k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA053212NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH123020NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH129420NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH122268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSouth Africa has the highest number of people with HIV (PWH) globally and a significant burden of co-occurring substance use disorder (SUD). Health care worker (HCW) stigma towards SUD is a key barrier to HIV care engagement among PWH with SUD. Support from peers-individuals with lived experience of SUD-may be a promising solution for addressing SUD stigma, while also improving engagement in HIV care. We evaluated the perceived acceptability of integrating a peer role into community-based HIV care teams as a strategy to address SUD stigma at multiple levels and improve patient engagement in HIV care.

methodsPatients and stakeholders (N = 40) were recruited from publicly-funded HIV and SUD organizations in Cape Town, South Africa. We conducted a quantitative assessment of stigma among stakeholders using an adapted Social Distance Scale (SDS) and patient perceptions of working with a peer, as well as semi-structured interviews focused on experiences of SUD stigma, acceptability of a peer model integrated into community-based HIV care, and potential peer roles.

resultsOn the SDS, 75% of stakeholders had high stigma towards a patient with SUD, yet 90% had low stigma when in recovery for at least 2 years. All patients endorsed feeling comfortable talking to someone in recovery and wanting them on their HIV care team. Three main themes emerged from the qualitative data: (1) patient-reported experiences of enacted SUD and HIV stigmas were common and impacted HIV care engagement; (2) both patients and stakeholders considered a peer model highly acceptable for integration into HIV care to support engagement and address SUD stigma; and (3) patients and stakeholders identified both individual-level and systems-level roles for peers, how peers could work alongside other providers to improve patient care, and key characteristics that peers would need to be successful in these roles.

conclusionsFindings from this formative work point to the promise of a peer model for reducing SUD stigma among patients and HCWs within community-based HIV care teams in SA.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSubstance-Related DisordersHumansQualitative ResearchSocial StigmaSouth AfricaGlobal mental healthHIV stigmaImplementation sciencePeerSubstance use stigmaSubstance use treatment

Identifiers

PMID36131304
PMCPMC9490994
OpenAlexW4296711105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.