Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36131284›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2022

Actions taken to safeguard the intended health care chain of older people with multiple diagnoses - a critical incident study.

Lena-Karin Gustafsson, Viktoria Zander, Anna Bondesson, Tina Pettersson, El-Marie Anbacken, Gunnel Östlund

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lena-Karin GustafssonDivision of Caring Science, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalens University, Box 325, 63105, Eskilstuna, Sweden. lena-karin.gustafsson@mdu.se.
Viktoria ZanderDivision of Physiotherapy, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Division of Physiotherapy, Mälardalens University, Västerås, Sweden.
Anna BondessonDivision of Caring Science, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalens University, Box 325, 63105, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
Tina PetterssonDivision of Caring Science, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalens University, Box 325, 63105, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
El-Marie AnbackenDivision of Social work, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalens University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
Gunnel ÖstlundDivision of Social work, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalens University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
Eskilstuna Municipality · SEMälardalen University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder people with multiple diagnoses often have problems coping with their daily lives at home because of lack of coordination between various parts of the healthcare chain during the transit from hospital care to the home. To provide good care to those persons who have the most complex needs, regions and municipalities must work together. It is of importance to develop further empirical knowledge in relation to older persons with multiple diagnoses to illuminate possible obstacles to person-centred care during the transition between healthcare institutions and the persons livelihood. The aim of the present study was to describe nurses' experienced critical incidents in different parts of the intended healthcare chain of older people with multiple diagnoses.

methodsThe sample consisted of 18 RNs in different parts of the healthcare system involved in the care of older people with multiple diagnoses. Data were collected by semi structured interviews and analysed according to Critical Incident Technique (CIT). A total of 169 critical incidents were identified describing experiences in recently experienced situations.

resultsThe result showed that organizational restrictions in providing care and limitations in collaboration were the main areas of experienced critical incidents. Actions took place due to the lack of preventive actions for care, difficulties in upholding patients' legal rights to participation in care, deficiencies in cooperation between organizations as well as ambiguous responsibilities and roles. The RNs experienced critical incidents that required moral actions to ensure continued person-centred nursing and provide evidence-based care. Both types of critical incidents required sole responsibility from the nurse. The RNs acted due to ethics, 'walking the extra mile', searching for person-centred information, and finding out own knowledge barriers.

conclusionsIn conclusion and based on this critical incident study, home-based healthcare of older people with multiple diagnoses requires a nurse that is prepared to take personal and moral responsibility to ensure person-centred home-based healthcare. Furthermore, the development of in-between adjustments of organizations to secure cooperation, and transference of person-centred knowledge is needed.

Indexed as

Care-coordinationCritical incidence techniqueHome-based healthcareMultiple diagnosesOlder peoplePerson-centred care

Identifiers

PMID36131284
PMCPMC9490918
OpenAlexW4296713940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.