ArticleBMC ophthalmology2022
Different visual evoked potentials in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-related optic neuritis and idiopathic demyelinating optic neuritis: a prospective longitudinal analysis.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic characterization of pathological and functional deterioration in a mouse model of optic neuritis related to neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Decoding Visual Pathway Dysfunction with SERF-MEG: A Study in Patients with Optic Neuropathy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neuromyelitis optica - a cause for longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis: a rare case report from Nepal and literature review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Why repair fails in AQP4-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disease: an astrocyte-centered framework for remyelination and neuroaxonal preservation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate different visual evoked potential (VEP) patterns in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-related optic neuritis (NMOSD-ON) and idiopathic demyelinating optic neuritis (IDON).
methodsThis was a longitudinal, prospective, case-control study. Eighty-four Chinese patients with acute optic neuritis were enrolled, including 26 NMOSD-ON patients and 58 IDON patients. All the patients underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and full-field pattern reversal VEP recordings at the onset, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.
resultsWithin 15' checks, the NMOSD-ON patients had more severe VEP amplitude reduction at 6 months (2.39 ± 4.63 μV vs. 6.96 ± 8.88 μV, P = 0.034). However, the IDON patients showed more frequently normal VEP response at 3 months (24.0% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.017), and only prolonged P100 peak latency with normal amplitude (L) at 6 months (30.0% vs. 57.8%, P = 0.048). Within 60' checks, no significant difference in VEP parameters between the two groups was found at each follow-up (P > 0.05).
conclusionsThe NMOSD-ON patients showed more severe axonal damage and worse axonal recovery than the IDON patients. VEP elicited by smaller check size was more sensitive to visual pathway abnormality in NMOSD-ON.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.