Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36131252›Full record

ArticleDementia (London, England)2022

Living in uncertainty while a spouse is undergoing a cognitive assessment: Voices of women care partners.

Ragnhild Hedman, Pernilla Hillerås, Marie Tyrrell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ragnhild HedmanDepartment of Nursing Science, 25548Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0103-8994
Pernilla HilleråsRed Cross University College, Huddinge, Sweden.
Marie TyrrellDepartment of Nursing Science, 25548Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6405-2326
Sophiahemmet University College · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWomen often support partners with cognitive symptoms during the assessment process and when they are receiving a cognitive diagnosis. Living with a partner with cognitive symptoms can be stressful; however, there is limited insights into the specific experiences of older women during the assessment process. Previous research indicates that there are gender differences in the experiences of spousal caregiving; however, further research is needed in regard to the experiences of men and women as care partners. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to describe women's experiences of living with a partner undergoing a cognitive assessment.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with seven women when their male partners commenced a cognitive assessment and after the assessment had been completed. The interviews were analysed with abductive content analysis.

findingsUncertainty permeated the women's experiences. Antecedents, attributes and strategies to manage the uncertainty were described.

conclusionThe participants expressed informational and existential uncertainty when their partner underwent a cognitive assessment. A lack of knowledge regarding the assessment process and cognitive diagnoses, especially mild cognitive impairment, was identified. Further, there was a need to process existential uncertainty evoked by the situation.

Indexed as

DementiaSpousesAgedCaregiversCognitionFemaleHumansMaleUncertaintycaregivercare partnercognitive assessmentcognitive impairmentdementiaexperiencegenderneuropsychiatric symptomsuncertaintywiveswomen

Identifiers

PMID36131252
PMCPMC9583288
OpenAlexW4296986278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.