Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36131100›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral investigations2022

Comparison of tobacco and alcohol consumption in young and older patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Elis Ângela Batistella, Rogério Gondak, Elena Riet Correa Rivero, Saman Warnakulasuriya, Eliete Guerra, André Luís Porporatti, Graziela De Luca Canto

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Early-Onset Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Emerging Biological Insights, Risk Factors and Clinical Implications.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Elis Ângela BatistellaHealth Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Rector David Ferreira Lima Campus, Trindade, Florianopolis, SC, 88037150, Brazil. elisbatistella@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0158-5085
Rogério GondakDepartment of Pathology, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7547-660X
Elena Riet Correa RiveroDepartment of Pathology, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8516-8771
Saman WarnakulasuriyaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Experimental Oral Pathology, King's College Dental Institute, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9RS, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2103-0746
Eliete GuerraLaboratory of Oral Histopathology, Health Sciences Faculty, University of Brasilia (UnB), Brasilia, DF, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7622-1550
André Luís PorporattiLaboratoire de Neurobiologie OroFaciale, Université de Paris, France and GHPS Assitance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4379-9695
Graziela De Luca CantoBrazilian Centre for Evidence-Based Research, Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianopolis, SC, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7986-8317
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRCapital Region of Denmark · DKUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the proportion of young (up to 45 years of age) and older (over 45 years of age) oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients who report tobacco and alcohol consumption.

methodsObservational studies reporting tobacco and alcohol consumption among young and older OSCC patients were selected in a two-phase process. Search strategies were conducted on five main electronic databases and complemented by grey literature. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data. Synthesis of results was calculated with the software R Statistics version 4.0.2 (The R Foundation).

resultsFrom 6675 records identified, 38 studies met the eligibility criteria and were selected for qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis, encompassing 2439 young and 13,393 older patients. Tobacco smoking was reported by 39.5% (confidence interval (CI) = 31.7% to 47.9%, I

conclusionThe comparison in the proportion of individuals reporting tobacco and alcohol consumption demonstrated that these habits were more prevalent in the older group (48.4% and 45.8% respectively) than in the young group (39.5% and 30.9%, respectively). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As a significant proportion of patients with OSCC reported no habits, novel risk factors for OSCC need to be investigated in further research.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsMouth NeoplasmsAlcohol DrinkingHumansNicotianaObservational Studies as TopicSmokingSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckOral squamous cell carcinomaRisk factorsSystematic reviewYoung patients

Identifiers

PMID36131100
OpenAlexW4296551295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.