ArticleDisability and health journal2023
Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus among adults aging with vision impairment: The role of the neighborhood environment.
Article in Disability and health journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neighborhoods and Incident Cardiometabolic Disease in People With Disability.American journal of preventive medicine · 2025Article
- Seeing the unseen: uncovering health-related social needs through universal screening at an academic ophthalmology practice.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Neighborhood Built Environments and Health in Later Life: A Literature Review.Journal of aging and health · 2025Review
- Experimental Validation of Antiobesogenic and Osteoprotective Efficacy of Ginsenoside CK via Targeting Lipid and Atherosclerosis Pathways.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Association between Age-Related Macular Degeneration and the Risk of Diabetes Mellitus: A Nationwide Cohort Study.Biomedicines · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVision impairment (VI) affects approximately 1 in 28 Americans over the age of 40 and the prevalence increases sharply with age. However, experiencing vision loss with aging can be very different from aging with VI acquired earlier in life. People aging with VI may be at increased risk for diabetes due to environmental barriers in accessing health care, healthy food, and recreational resources that can facilitate positive health behaviors.
objectiveThis study examined the relationship between neighborhood characteristics and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among a cohort of 22,719 adults aging with VI.
methodsData are from Optum® Clinformatics® DataMart, a private administrative claims database (2008-2017). Individuals 18 years of age and older at the time of their initial VI diagnosis were eligible for analysis. VI was determined using vision impairment, low vision, and blindness codes (ICD-9-CM, ICD-10-CM). Covariates included age, sex, and comorbidities. Cox models estimated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for incident T2DM. Stratified models examined differences in those aging with (age 18-64) and aging into (age 65+) vision impairment.
resultsResidence in neighborhoods with greater intersection density (HR = 1.26) and high-speed roads (HR = 1.22) were associated with increased risk of T2DM among older adults with VI. Living in neighborhoods with broadband internet access (HR = 0.67), optical stores (HR = 0.62), supermarkets (HR = 0.78), and gyms/fitness centers (HR = 0.63) was associated with reduced risk of T2DM for both younger and older adults with VI.
conclusionsFindings emphasize the importance of neighborhood context for mitigating the adverse consequences of vision loss for health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.