Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36130834›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesia2022

Development and internal validation of a model for postoperative morbidity in adults undergoing major elective colorectal surgery: the peri-operative quality improvement programme (PQIP) colorectal risk model.

J Bedford, P Martin, S Crowe, D Wagstaff, C Santos, G Singleton, R Baumber, C Vindrola-Padros, R Vohra, M Swart and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

J BedfordUCLH Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6045-3226
P MartinDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, UK.
S CroweClinical Operational Research Unit, University College London, UK.
D WagstaffUCLH Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
C SantosHealth Services Research Centre, National Institute for Academic Anaesthesia, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK.
G SingletonCentre for Peri-operative Medicine, Research Department for Targeted Intervention, UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK.
R BaumberDepartment of Anaesthesia, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
C Vindrola-PadrosResearch Department for Targeted Intervention, UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK.
R VohraDepartment of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
M SwartDepartment of Anaesthesia, Torbay and South Devon NHS Trust, Devon, UK.
C M OliverUCLH Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
J DoreyLay Committee, Royal College of Anaesthetists and Lay representatives PQIP Project team, London, UK.
I LeemanLay Committee, Royal College of Anaesthetists and Lay representatives PQIP Project team, London, UK.
S R MoonesingheUCLH Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6730-5824
peri-operative quality improvement programme (PQIP) collaborative
University College London · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal College of Anaesthetists · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBRoyal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust · GBTorbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Royal College of AnaesthetistsThe Health Foundation AIMS ID: 430167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 1.5 million major surgical procedures take place in the UK NHS each year and approximately 25% of patients develop at least one complication. The most widely used risk-adjustment model for postoperative morbidity in the UK is the physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity. However, this model was derived more than 30 years ago and now overestimates the risk of morbidity. In addition, contemporary definitions of some model predictors are markedly different compared with when the tool was developed. A second model used in clinical practice is the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Programme risk model; this provides a risk estimate for a range of postoperative complications. This model, widely used in North America, is not open source and therefore cannot be applied to patient populations in other settings. Data from a prospective multicentre clinical dataset of 118 NHS hospitals (the peri-operative quality improvement programme) were used to develop a bespoke risk-adjustment model for postoperative morbidity. Patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent colorectal surgery were eligible for inclusion. Postoperative morbidity was defined using the postoperative morbidity survey at postoperative day 7. Thirty-one candidate variables were considered for inclusion in the model. Death or morbidity occurred by postoperative day 7 in 3098 out of 11,646 patients (26.6%). Twelve variables were incorporated into the final model, including (among others): Rockwood clinical frailty scale; body mass index; and index of multiple deprivation quintile. The C-statistic was 0.672 (95%CI 0.660-0.684), with a bootstrap optimism corrected C-statistic of 0.666 at internal validation. The model demonstrated good calibration across the range of morbidity estimates with a mean slope gradient of predicted risk of 0.959 (95%CI 0.894-1.024) with an index-corrected intercept of -0.038 (95%CI -0.112-0.036) at internal validation. Our model provides parsimonious case-mix adjustment to quantify risk of morbidity on postoperative day 7 for a UK population of patients undergoing major colorectal surgery. Despite the C-statistic of < 0.7, our model outperformed existing risk-models in widespread use. We therefore recommend application in case-mix adjustment, where incorporation into a continuous monitoring tool such as the variable life adjusted display or exponentially-weighted moving average-chart could support high-level monitoring and quality improvement of risk-adjusted outcome at the population level.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsColorectal SurgeryAdultHumansMorbidityPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesQuality ImprovementRisk AssessmentRisk Factorscolorectal surgerymonitoringmorbidityquality improvementrisk-adjustment

Identifiers

PMID36130834
PMCPMC9826419
OpenAlexW4296708615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.