Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36130476›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2022

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5: Evolving tropism and evasion of potent humoral responses and resistance to clinical immunotherapeutics relative to viral variants of concern.

Anupriya Aggarwal, Anouschka Akerman, Vanessa Milogiannakis, Mariana Ruiz Silva, Gregory Walker, Alberto Ospina Stella, Andrea Kindinger, Thomas Angelovich, Emily Waring, Supavadee Amatayakul-Chantler and 19 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. TMPRSS2-mediated coronavirus spike activation and inhibition.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. CD56Clinical & translational immunology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Anupriya AggarwalThe Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.
Anouschka AkermanThe Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.
Vanessa MilogiannakisThe Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.
Mariana Ruiz SilvaThe Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.
Gregory WalkerSerology and Virology Division (SAViD), NSW Health Pathology, Randwick, Australia.
Alberto Ospina StellaThe Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrea KindingerThe Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.
Thomas AngelovichSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Australia.
Emily WaringSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Australia.
Supavadee Amatayakul-ChantlerDepartment of Bioanalytical Sciences, Plasma Product Development, Research & Development, CSL Behring, Australia.
Nathan RothPlasma Product Development, Research & Development, CSL Behring AG, Bern, Switzerland.
Sandro ManniDepartment of Bioanalytical Sciences, Plasma Product Development, Research & Development, CSL Behring AG, Bern, Switzerland.
Thomas HauserDepartment of Bioanalytical Sciences, Plasma Product Development, Research & Development, CSL Behring AG, Bern, Switzerland.
Thomas BarnesDepartment of Bioanalytical Sciences, Plasma Product Development, Research & Development, CSL Behring AG, Bern, Switzerland.
Anna CondyliosSerology and Virology Division (SAViD), NSW Health Pathology, Randwick, Australia.
Malinna YeangSerology and Virology Division (SAViD), NSW Health Pathology, Randwick, Australia.
Maureen WongSerology and Virology Division (SAViD), NSW Health Pathology, Randwick, Australia.
Tyra JeanSerology and Virology Division (SAViD), NSW Health Pathology, Randwick, Australia.
Charles S P FosterSerology and Virology Division (SAViD), NSW Health Pathology, Randwick, Australia.
Daniel ChristGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Alexandra Carey HoppeThe Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.
Mee Ling MunierThe Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.
David DarleySt Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Melissa ChurchillSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Australia.
Damien J StarkMolecular Diagnostic Medicine Laboratory, Sydpath, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Gail MatthewsThe Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia; St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
William D RawlinsonSerology and Virology Division (SAViD), NSW Health Pathology, Randwick, Australia.
Anthony D KelleherThe Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia; St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Stuart G TurvilleThe Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: sturville@kirby.unsw.edu.au.
UNSW Sydney · AUNew South Wales Department of Health · AUCSL (Switzerland) · CHRMIT University · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AUCSL (Australia) · AUGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetically distinct viral variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been recorded since January 2020. The introduction of global vaccine programs has contributed to lower COVID-19 hospitalisation and mortality rates, particularly in developed countries. In late 2021, Omicron BA.1 emerged, with substantially altered genetic differences and clinical effects from other variants of concern. Shortly after dominating global spread in early 2022, BA.1 was supplanted by the genetically distinct Omicron lineage BA.2. A sub-lineage of BA.2, designated BA.5, presently has an outgrowth advantage over BA.2 and other BA.2 sub-lineages. Here we study the neutralisation of Omicron BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5 and pre-Omicron variants using a range of vaccine and convalescent sera and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies using a live virus neutralisation assay. Using primary nasopharyngeal swabs, we also tested the relative fitness of BA.5 compared to pre-Omicron and Omicron viral lineages in their ability to use the ACE2-TMPRSS2 pathway.

methodsUsing low passage clinical isolates of Clade A.2.2, Beta, Delta, BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5, we determined humoral neutralisation in vitro in vaccinated and convalescent cohorts, using concentrated human IgG pooled from thousands of plasma donors, and licensed monoclonal antibody therapies. We then determined infectivity to particle ratios in primary nasopharyngeal samples and expanded low passage isolates in a genetically engineered ACE2/TMPRSS2 cell line in the presence and absence of the TMPRSS2 inhibitor Nafamostat.

findingsPeak responses to 3 doses of BNT162b2 vaccine were associated with a 9-fold reduction in neutralisation for Omicron lineages BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5. Concentrated pooled human IgG from convalescent and vaccinated donors and BNT162b2 vaccination with BA.1 breakthrough infections were associated with greater breadth of neutralisation, although the potency was still reduced 7-fold across all Omicron lineages. Testing of clinical grade antibodies revealed a 14.3-fold reduction using Evusheld and 16.8-fold reduction using Sotrovimab for the BA.5. Whilst the infectivity of BA.1 and BA.2 was attenuated in ACE2/TMPRSS2 entry, BA.5 was observed to be equivalent to that of an early 2020 circulating clade and had greater sensitivity to the TMPRSS2 inhibitor Nafamostat.

interpretationObservations support all Omicron variants to significantly escape neutralising antibodies across a range of vaccination and/or convalescent responses. Potency of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies is also reduced and differs across Omicron lineages. The key difference of BA.5 from other Omicron sub-variants is the reversion in tropism back to using the well-known ACE2-TMPRSS2 pathway, utilised efficiently by pre-Omicron lineages. Monitoring if these changes influence transmission and/or disease severity will be key for ongoing tracking and management of Omicron waves globally.

fundingThis work was primarily supported by Australian Medical Foundation research grants MRF2005760 (ST, GM & WDR), MRF2001684 (ADK and ST) and Medical Research Future Fund Antiviral Development Call grant (WDR), Medical Research Future Fund COVID-19 grant (MRFF2001684, ADK & SGT) and the New South Wales Health COVID-19 Research Grants Round 2 (SGT).

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntiviral AgentsAustraliaBenzamidinesBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 SerotherapyGuanidinesHumansImmunization, PassiveImmunoglobulin GImmunotherapyAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntiviral AgentsBenzamidinesBNT162 VaccineGuanidinesImmunoglobulin GnafamostatsotrovimabSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2ACE2BA.2BA.5Neutralising antibodiesOmicron BA.1SARS-CoV-2TMPRSS2

Identifiers

PMID36130476
PMCPMC9482529
OpenAlexW4296250187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.