Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36130244›Full record

ArticleInternational health2022

Responsive neglected tropical disease programme delivery: listening and responding to the views and perceptions of beneficiaries.

Nurudeen Dauda, Danny Harvey, Sarah Martindale, Hannah Hume, Folake Oluwayemisi Aliu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nurudeen DaudaSightsavers, 1 Golf Course Road, P.O. Box 503, Kaduna, Nigeria.
Danny HarveySightsavers, 35 Perrymount Road, Haywards Heath, West Sussex, UK, RH16 3BZ.
Sarah MartindaleLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK, L3 5QA.
Hannah HumeLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK, L3 5QA.
Folake Oluwayemisi AliuSightsavers, 1 Golf Course Road, P.O. Box 503, Kaduna, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In neglected tropical disease (NTD) programmes, beneficiary feedback mechanisms (BFMs) can be utilised to enhance programme quality and strengthen health outcomes by promoting the participation and empowerment of local stakeholders. This article reflects on the experiences of the Ascend programme in embedding a BFM in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Nigeria where key NTD data collection tools were adapted and prioritised across various elements of the NTD programme. Findings suggest that listening and responding to the needs of beneficiaries and building upon existing systems within NTD programmes is highly valuable in informing the planning and delivery of NTD activities.

Indexed as

Tropical MedicineHumansNeglected DiseasesNigeriabeneficiary, beneficiary feedbackequityfeedbackintegrationNTDs

Identifiers

PMID36130244
PMCPMC9492254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.