Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36130243›Full record

ArticleInternational health2022

Resuming NTD activities in the context of COVID-19: an investigation into the advantages of risk assessment processes to mitigate the transmission of COVID-19 during NTD delivery.

Ioasia Radvan, Folake Oluwayemisi Aliu, Anthony Bettee, Abdourahim Cisse, Sonnie Ziama Gbewo, Nicholas Olobio, Michel Sagno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ioasia RadvanSightsavers, Haywards Heath, RH16 3BZ, UK.
Folake Oluwayemisi AliuSightsavers, Kaduna, P.O. Box 503, Nigeria.
Anthony BetteeNeglected Tropical Diseases, Ministry of Health, Monrovia, P.O. Box 10-9009, Liberia.
Abdourahim CisseSightsavers, 5673 Conakry, Guinea.
Sonnie Ziama GbewoHealth Services, Ministry of Health, Monrovia, P.O. Box 10-9009, Liberia.
Nicholas OlobioPublic Health, Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja 900104, Nigeria.
Michel SagnoNational Program Against Neglected Tropical Diseases, Ministry of Health, Conakry, BP 585, Republic of Guinea.
Sightsavers · GBFederal Ministry of Health · NGMinistry of Health and Public Hygiene · GN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe neglected tropical disease (NTD) sector is adapting to the uncertain circumstances of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The development of the Risk Assessment and Mitigation Action (RAMA) tool was driven by partners of the programme Accelerating the Sustainable Control and Elimination of NTDs (hereafter called Ascend) to enable countries to recommence NTD activities following the World Health Organization advisories of April and July 2020. This article explores the advantages of the RAMA process for NTD delivery.

methodsThe analysis used interview transcripts with NTD practitioners in Cote d'Ivoire, Guinea, Liberia and Nigeria and results from the monitoring of compliance with COVID-19 mitigation measures in Nigeria.

resultsThree themes emerged from the results: adaptability and innovation, collaboration and government ownership and preparedness.

conclusionsThe advantages of the RAMA tool suggest its importance in mitigating the transmission of COVID-19 during NTD delivery. There is the potential for the tool to be adapted for use throughout future pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19Tropical MedicineHumansNeglected DiseasesPandemicsRisk AssessmentCOVID-19mitigationNTDsrisk assessmenttransmission

Identifiers

PMID36130243
PMCPMC9492271
OpenAlexW4296701260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.