Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36129925›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Intimate-partner violence and its association with symptoms of depression, perceived health, and quality of life in the Himalayan Mountain Villages of Gilgit Baltistan.

Gul Nowshad, Neelum Jahan, Nasim Zahid Shah, Nasloon Ali, Tazeen Ali, Sartaj Alam, Ambreen Khan, Mohammad Afzal Mahmood, Malika Saba, Danilo Arnone and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and quality of life in Southern Brazil: a cross-sectional study, 2022.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gul NowshadCenter for Clinical Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States of America.
Neelum JahanAga Khan Health Service, Gilgit, Pakistan.
Nasim Zahid ShahCenter of Excellence Women & Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Nasloon AliInstitute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE.
Tazeen AliSchool of Nursing and Midwifery/Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-8896-8766
Sartaj AlamHarvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Ambreen KhanDepartment of Behavioral Sciences, Margalla Institute of Health Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Mohammad Afzal MahmoodSchool of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9395-8693
Malika SabaDepartment of Health, Government of Gilgit Baltistan, Gilgit, Pakistan.
Danilo ArnoneDepartment of Psychiatry and Behaviour Sciences, College of medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain, UAE.
Syed M ShahInstitute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE.ORCID 0000-0002-0956-465X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesWe aimed to estimate the prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) and associated risk factors in married women in rural villages of Gilgit Baltistan in Pakistan.

methodsA cross-sectional design to assess the magnitude and factors associated with IPV in a random sample of 789 married women aged 18-49 years. A World Health Organization screening instrument was used to assess the presence of IPV in the previous 12 months. A locally validated instrument was adopted to identify self-reported symptoms of major depression according to the DSM IV. Trained nurses obtained socio-demographic and reproductive history through structured interviews. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to estimate prevalence and identify significant predictors of IPV.

resultsThe mean age of the participants was 38.3 years (SD: ±12.8). The prevalence of IPV in women was 22.8% (95% Confidence Interval: 20.0-25.9), 18.5% in pregnant women (95% CI: 11.7-27.9) and significantly associated with depression in 55.1% of IPV cases. Husband education level (college/higher) (Adjusted Odds Ratio: 0.40; 95%CI: 0.22-0.70) and high household income (AOR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.29-0.68) were protective against IPV. Increase in age (AOR;1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.02) and poor relationship with mother-in-law increased the risk of IPV (AOR = 2.85; 95% CI: 1.90-4.28). IPV was positively associated with symptoms of depression (AOR = 1.97; 95% CI:1.39-2.77), poor perceived quality of life (AOR = 3.54; 95% CI: 1.90-6.58) and poor health (AOR = 2.74; 95% CI: 1.92-3.92).

conclusionIPV is substantial public health burden significantly associated with depressive symptoms, poor perceived health and the quality of life.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolenceQuality of LifeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrevalenceRisk FactorsSexual Partners

Identifiers

PMID36129925
PMCPMC9491585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.