ArticlePloS one2022
Two-step nationwide epidemiological survey of myasthenia gravis in Japan 2018.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can Non-Thymomatous Late-Onset Myasthenia Gravis Benefit From Thymectomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.European journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence, Incidence, and Mortality of Myasthenia Gravis and Myasthenic Syndromes: A Systematic Review.Neuroepidemiology · 2025Pooled it
- Trends in thymectomy for myasthenia gravis in Japan: analysis of a nationwide surgical registry from 1996 to 2023.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Patient- and Caregiver-Reported Burden and Quality of Life in Generalised Myasthenia Gravis: A Multinational Real-World Survey in the Asia-Pacific Region.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Treatment Patterns in Patients with Late-Onset Myasthenia Gravis in Japan: An Insurance Claims Database Study.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2026Article
- Burden of Disease in Myasthenia Gravis: A Targeted Literature Review.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Aging and rare diseases: from epidemiology to a call to action.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- Myasthenia gravis following the initiation of statin therapy: A multinational self-controlled case series study.Journal of internal medicine · 2026Observational
- Nationwide trends in mediastinal tumor and myasthenia gravis surgery in Japan: a decade claims-based analysis (2014-2023).International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Elucidating genetic backgrounds of myasthenia gravis in Japanese by genome-wide association studies and multi-omics analyses of thymoma.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Clinical Impact of High-Dose Corticosteroids on Healthcare Resource Utilization and Steroid-Related Complications in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis in Japan.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Cavernous Sinus Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Initially Misdiagnosed As Ocular Myasthenia Gravis: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Management of Myasthenic Crisis and Emerging Roles of Molecularly Targeted Therapies: A Narrative Review.Neurology international · 2025Review
- Article
- Myasthenia gravis in 2025: five new things and four hopes for the future.Journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Treatment patterns and impact of glucocorticoids on health outcomes in generalized myasthenia gravis: a retrospective observational study based on the Medical Data Vision database in Japan.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Comparative study of Japanese nationwide epidemiological studies of myasthenia gravis using datasets of 2006 and 2018.PloS one · 2025Article
- Humanistic burden and medical care patterns of real-world patients with myasthenia gravis in Japan.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Long-Term Bone Density Changes and Fracture Risk in Myasthenia Gravis: Implications for FRAXHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Myasthenia Gravis Disease Burden and Its Impact on Satisfaction with Life: A Qualitative Survey of Patients' Perspectives in Japan.Neurology and therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study the updated prevalence and clinical features of myasthenia gravis (MG) in Japan during 2017.
methodsWe sent survey sheets to the randomly selected medical departments (number = 7,545). First, we asked the number of MG patients who visited medical departments from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017. Then, we sent the second survey sheet to the medical departments that answered the first survey to obtain the clinical information of patients who received MG diagnosis between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017.
resultsThe received answer to the first survey were 2,708 (recovery rate: 35.9%). After all, the prevalence of the 100,000 population was estimated as 23.1 (95%CI: 20.5-25.6). As a result of the second survey, we obtained 1,464 case records. After checking the duplications and lacking data, we utilized 1,195 data for further analysis. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] from the onset age of total patients was 59 (43-70) years old. The male-female ratio was 1: 1.15. The onset age [median (IQR)] for female patients was 58 (40-72) years old, and that for male patients was 60 (49-69) years old (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.0299). We divided patients into four categories: 1) anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChRAb) (+) thymoma (Tm) (-), 2) AChRAb(+)Tm(+), 3) anti-muscle-specific kinase antibody (MuSKAb) (+), and AChRAb(-)MuSKAb(-) (double negative; DN). The onset age [median (IQR)] of AChRAb(+)Tm(-) was 64 (48-73) years old, and AChRb(+)Tm(+) was 55 (45-66), MuSKAb(+) was 49 (36-64), DN was 47 (35-60) year old. The multivariate logistic regression analysis using sex, initial symptoms, repetitive nerve stimulation test (RNST), and edrophonium test revealed that sex, ocular symptoms, bulbar symptoms, and RNST were factors to distinguish each category. The myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile at the severest state were significantly higher in MuSKAb(+). MuSKAb(+) frequently received prednisolone, tacrolimus plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin; however, they received less acetylcholine esterase inhibitor. 99.2% of AChRAb(+)Tm(+) and 15.4% of AChRAb(+)Tm(-) received thymectomy. MuSKAb(+) did not receive thymectomy, and only 5.7% of DN received thymectomy. The prognosis was favorable in all categories.
conclusionOur result revealed that the prevalence of Japanese MG doubled from the previous study using the same survey method in 2006. We also found that the onset age shifted to the elderly, and the male-female ratio reached almost even. Classification in four categories; AChRAb(+)Tm(-), AChRAb(+)Tm(+), MuSKAb(+), and DN, well describe the specific clinical features of each category and differences in therapeutic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.