Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36129897›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Information and vaccine hesitancy: Evidence from the early stage of the vaccine roll-out in 28 European countries.

Francesca Agosti, Veronica Toffolutti, Nicolò Cavalli, Sanna Nivakoski, Massimiliano Mascherini, Arnstein Aassve

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Trust and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Francesca Agosti"Carlo F. Dondena" Centre for Research on Social Dynamics and Public Policies, Bocconi University, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1444-3382
Veronica Toffolutti"Carlo F. Dondena" Centre for Research on Social Dynamics and Public Policies, Bocconi University, Milano, Italy.
Nicolò Cavalli"Carlo F. Dondena" Centre for Research on Social Dynamics and Public Policies, Bocconi University, Milano, Italy.
Sanna NivakoskiEuropean Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin, Ireland.
Massimiliano MascheriniEuropean Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin, Ireland.
Arnstein Aassve"Carlo F. Dondena" Centre for Research on Social Dynamics and Public Policies, Bocconi University, Milano, Italy.
Bocconi University · ITEuropean Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions · IEQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of mass vaccination programs against SARS-CoV-2 hinges on the public's acceptance of the vaccines. During a vaccine roll-out, individuals have limited information about the potential side-effects and benefits. Given the public health concern of the COVID pandemic, providing appropriate information fast matters for the success of the campaign. In this paper, time-trends in vaccine hesitancy were examined using a sample of 35,390 respondents from the Eurofound's Living, Working and COVID-19 (LWC) data collected between 12 February and 28 March 2021 across 28 European countries. The data cover the initial stage of the vaccine roll-out. We exploit the fact that during this period, news about rare cases of blood clots with low blood platelets were potentially linked to the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine (or Vaxzeveria). Multivariate regression models were used to analyze i) vaccine hesitancy trends, and whether any trend-change was associated with the link between the AstraZeneca vaccine ii) and blood clots (AstraZeneca controversy), and iii) the suspension among several European countries. Our estimates show that vaccine hesitancy increased over the early stage of the vaccine roll-out (0·002, 95% CI: [0·002 to 0·003]), a positive shift took place in the likelihood of hesitancy following the controversy (0·230, 95% CI: [0·157 to 0·302]), with the trend subsequently turning negative (-0·007, 95% CI: [-0·010 to -0·005]). Countries deciding to suspend the AstraZeneca vaccine experienced an increase in vaccine hesitancy after the suspensions (0·068, 95% CI: [0·04 to 0·095]). Trust in institutions is negatively associated with vaccine hesitancy. The results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy increased steadily since the beginning of the vaccine roll-out and the AstraZeneca controversy and its suspension, made modest (though significant) contributions to increased hesitancy.

Indexed as

COVID-19Urination DisordersVaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2SuspensionsVaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesSuspensionsVaccines

Identifiers

PMID36129897
PMCPMC9491558
OpenAlexW4296795719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.