Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36129890›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Wellbeing and coping of UK nurses, midwives and allied health professionals during COVID-19-a cross-sectional study.

Patricia Gillen, Ruth D Neill, John Mallett, John Moriarty, Jill Manthorpe, Heike Schroder, Denise Currie, Susan McGrory, Patricia Nicholl, Jermaine Ravalier and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluating the well-being of ENT trainees in the UK: survey findings.The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Long-Term Quality of Life after COVID-19 Infection: Cross-Sectional Study of Health Care Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Patricia GillenSchool of Nursing Jordanstown Campus, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Ruth D NeillSchool of Applied Social and Policy Sciences, Ulster University, Derry-Londonderry, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6387-4213
John MallettSchool of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7539-3329
John MoriartySchool of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Jill ManthorpeNIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Heike SchroderQueen's Management School, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Denise CurrieQueen's Management School, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Susan McGrorySchool of Nursing Jordanstown Campus, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Patricia NichollSchool of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Jermaine RavalierSchool of Science, Bath Spa University, Bath, United Kingdom.
Paula McFaddenSchool of Applied Social and Policy Sciences, Ulster University, Derry-Londonderry, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health PR-PRU-1217-21002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nurse, Midwives and Allied Health Professionals (AHPs), along with other health and social care colleagues are the backbone of healthcare services. They have played a key role in responding to the increased demands on healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper compares cross-sectional data on quality of working life, wellbeing, coping and burnout of nurses, midwives and AHPs in the United Kingdom (UK) at two time points during the COVID-19 pandemic. An anonymous online repeated cross-sectional survey was conducted at two timepoints, Phase 1 (7th May 2020-3rd July 2020); Phase 2 (17th November 2020-1st February 2021). The survey consisted of the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale, the Work-Related Quality of Life Scale, and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (Phase 2 only) to measure wellbeing, quality of working life and burnout. The Brief COPE scale and Strategies for Coping with Work and Family Stressors scale assessed coping strategies. Descriptive statistics and multiple linear regressions examined the effects of coping strategies and demographic and work-related variables on wellbeing and quality of working life. A total of 1839 nurses, midwives and AHPs responded to the first or second survey, with a final sample of 1410 respondents -586 from Phase 1; 824 from Phase 2, (422 nurses, 192 midwives and 796 AHPs). Wellbeing and quality of working life scores were significantly lower in the Phase 2 sample compared to respondents in Phase 1 (p<0.001). The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant effect on psychological wellbeing and quality of working life which decreased while the use of negative coping and burnout of these healthcare professionals increased. Health services are now trying to respond to the needs of patients with COVID-19 variants while rebuilding services and tackling the backlog of normal care provision. This workforce would benefit from additional support/services to prevent further deterioration in mental health and wellbeing and optimise workforce retention.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19MidwiferyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousAdaptation, PsychologicalAllied Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPandemicsPregnancyQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36129890
PMCPMC9491587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.