Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36129839›Full record

Trial reportBlood advances2022

Patient perspectives on testing for clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential.

Tal Sella, Geoffrey G Fell, Peter G Miller, Christopher J Gibson, Shoshana M Rosenberg, Craig Snow, Daniel G Stover, Kathryn J Ruddy, Jeffrey M Peppercorn, Lidia Schapira and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01468246 (Helping Ourselves, Helping Others), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01468246 active not recruitingnot on this map

Helping Ourselves, Helping Others: The Young Women's Breast Cancer Study

TypeobservationalSponsorDana-Farber Cancer InstituteRan2006 to 2035Enrolled1,302ConditionsBreast Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Clonal Hematopoiesis in Women With Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clonal Hematopoiesis in Young Women Treated for Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Tal SellaMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Geoffrey G FellData Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Peter G MillerHarvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-6797-9335
Christopher J GibsonMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Shoshana M RosenbergDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Craig SnowMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Daniel G StoverDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0001-9003-8165
Kathryn J RuddyDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0001-6298-332X
Jeffrey M PeppercornHarvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA.
Lidia SchapiraDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Virginia F BorgesDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO.
Steven E ComeHarvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA.
Ellen WarnerDivision of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Elizabeth FrankMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Donna S NeubergData Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Benjamin L EbertMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-0197-5451
Ann H PartridgeMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Harvard University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCornell University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USMayo Clinic · USStanford University · USSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), an emerging biomarker for personalized risk-directed interventions, is increased in cancer survivors. However, little is known about patient preferences for CHIP testing. We surveyed participants in a prospective cohort study of young women with breast cancer (BC). The emailed survey included an introduction to CHIP and a vignette eliciting participants' preferences for CHIP testing, considering sequentially: population-based 10-year risk of BC recurrence, hematologic malignancy, and heart disease; increased CHIP-associated risks; current CHIP management; dedicated CHIP clinic; and hypothetical CHIP treatment. Preference changes were evaluated using the McNemar test. The survey response rate was 82.2% (528/642). Median age at time of survey was 46 years and median time from diagnosis was 108 months. Only 5.9% had prior knowledge of CHIP. After vignette presentation, most survivors (87.1%) recommended CHIP testing for the vignette patient. Presented next with CHIP-independent, population-based risks, 11.1% shifted their preference from testing to not testing. After receiving information about CHIP-associated risks, an additional 10.1% shifted their preference to testing. Preference for testing increased if vignette patient was offered a CHIP clinic or hypothetical CHIP treatment, with 7.2% and 14.1% switching preferences toward testing, respectively. Finally, 75.8% of participants desired CHIP testing for themselves. Among participants, 28.2% reported that learning about CHIP caused at least moderate anxiety. Most young survivors favored CHIP testing, with preferences influenced by risk presentation and potential management strategies. Our findings highlight the importance of risk communication and psychosocial support when considering biomarkers for future risk in cancer survivors. This trial has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01468246.

Indexed as

Clonal HematopoiesisHematopoiesisFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID36129839
PMCPMC9791300
OpenAlexW4297874867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.