Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36129761›Full record

ReviewChemSusChem2022

Redox Biocatalysis: Quantitative Comparisons of Nicotinamide Cofactor Regeneration Methods.

Victor K Sharma, Justin M Hutchison, Alan M Allgeier

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ChemSusChem, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cu and SnOChemSusChem · 2026
    Article
  8. De novo biosynthesis of Asperosaponin VI inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. An Update: Enzymatic Synthesis for Industrial Applications.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Direct Biocatalytic Processes for COMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victor K SharmaChemical and Petroleum Engineering, The University of Kansas, 1530 W 15th St, 66045, Lawrence, Kansas, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2370-978X
Justin M HutchisonCivil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, The University of Kansas, 1530 W 15th St, 66045, Lawrence, Kansas, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5575-6169
Alan M AllgeierChemical and Petroleum Engineering, The University of Kansas, 1530 W 15th St, 66045, Lawrence, Kansas, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9122-2108
University of Kansas · US

Funding

Synthetic Chemical Biology CoreP20GM113117 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI OROZCO, ROBIN C. · 2016 to 2025
$23.9M
Kansas Corn Commission 2205National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) P20 GM113117 (JMH)NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM113117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enzymatic processes, particularly those capable of performing redox reactions, have recently been of growing research interest. Substrate specificity, optimal activity at mild temperatures, high selectivity, and yield are among the desirable characteristics of these oxidoreductase catalyzed reactions. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate) or NAD(P)H-dependent oxidoreductases have been extensively studied for their potential applications like biosynthesis of chiral organic compounds, construction of biosensors, and pollutant degradation. One of the main challenges associated with making these processes commercially viable is the regeneration of the expensive cofactors required by the enzymes. Numerous efforts have pursued enzymatic regeneration of NAD(P)H by coupling a substrate reduction with a complementary enzyme catalyzed oxidation of a co-substrate. While offering excellent selectivity and high total turnover numbers, such processes involve complicated downstream product separation of a primary product from the coproducts and impurities. Alternative methods comprising chemical, electrochemical, and photochemical regeneration have been developed with the goal of enhanced efficiency and operational simplicity compared to enzymatic regeneration. Despite the goal, however, the literature rarely offers a meaningful comparison of the total turnover numbers for various regeneration methodologies. This comprehensive Review systematically discusses various methods of NAD(P)H cofactor regeneration and quantitatively compares performance across the numerous methods. Further, fundamental barriers to enhanced cofactor regeneration in the various methods are identified, and future opportunities are highlighted for improving the efficiency and sustainability of commercially viable oxidoreductase processes for practical implementation.

Indexed as

NADNiacinamideBiocatalysisNADPOxidation-ReductionOxidoreductasesRegenerationNADNADPNiacinamideOxidoreductasesbiocatalysiscofactor regenerationelectrocatalysisoxidoreductasesphotocatalysis

Identifiers

PMID36129761
PMCPMC10029092
OpenAlexW4297874831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.