Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36129728›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2022

Evidence-based classification in golf for athletes with a vision impairment: A Delphi study.

Niall J Hynes, Eldre W Beukes, Roger Hawkes, Howard A Bennett, Christian Hamilton, Prakash Jayabalan, Peter M Allen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Niall J HynesCentre for Vision across the Life Span, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0752-6270
Eldre W BeukesVision and Hearing Sciences Research Centre, School of Psychology and Sports Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Roger HawkesUniversity College London, London, UK.
Howard A BennettDurham University, Durham, UK.
Christian HamiltonGolf Australia, Australian Golf Centre, Cheltenham, Victoria, Australia.
Prakash JayabalanShirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Peter M AllenVision and Hearing Sciences Research Centre, School of Psychology and Sports Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4536-7215
Anglia Ruskin University · GBDurham University · GBGroup of Eight · AUNorthwestern University · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Huddersfield · GB

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)KL2TR001424 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SHARMA, LEENA · 2015 to 2023
$8.1M
The Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (OAIC) at Northwestern UniversityP30AG059988 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CELLA, DAVID · 2020 to 2024
$7.1M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001424NIA NIH HHS P30 AG059988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision-impaired (VI) golf is a global para-sport currently played under several different classification systems under different bodies. This study aimed to gather expert opinion to determine whether the current classification systems are fit for the purpose intended and to identify any particular issues where VI impacts the game of golf for the disabled (G4D). A panel of 20 participants with expertise in G4D took part in a three-round Delphi study. The panel agreed that the current classification system(s) for VI golf did not or only partially fulfilled the aim to minimise the impact of VI on the outcome of competition and that there should be one, internationally recognised, classification system. It was agreed that other metrics of VI, in addition to the measurement of visual acuity (VA), need to be considered. Intentional misrepresentation of VI was identified as a cause for concern. The panel agreed that the current classification system does not fully achieve its purpose. Any changes that are made to these classification systems need to be evidence based specific to VI golf. Further research is required to determine how measures of VI affect golfing performance and whether other metrics other than VA are required.

Indexed as

AthletesGolfVisual AcuityDelphi TechniqueHumansPersons with Disabilitiesgolflow visionsports visionvision impairment

Identifiers

PMID36129728
PMCPMC9547903
OpenAlexW4296705199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.