ArticleMolecular diagnosis & therapy2022
Digital PCR-Based Method for Detecting CDKN2A Loss in Brain Tumours.
Article in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A meta-analysis of the prognostic significance of CDKN deletions in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.Annals of medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Integrated multi-omics and single-cell analysis reveals CDKN2A-mediated cuproptosis mechanisms driving thyroid carcinoma progression.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Patient-derived glioma organoids real time identification of IDH mutation, 1p/19q-codeletion and CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion with differential ion mobility spectrometry.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- CDKN2A somatic copy number amplification in normal tissues surrounding gastric carcinoma reduces cancer metastasis risk in droplet digital PCR analysis.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024Article
- Novel liquid biopsy CNV biomarkers in malignant melanoma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCDKN2A is a key tumour suppressor gene and loss of CDKN2A can be found in many tumours. In astrocytoma grade IV, CDKN2A is deleted in more than 50% of tumours. In many instances, low-grade gliomas with homozygous loss of CDKN2A behave like high grade tumours. The available techniques for CDKN2A loss are laborious, expensive, unreliable, or unavailable in most pathology institutes. Therefore, although it is essential for accurate brain tumour diagnosis, the routine diagnosis does not include testing for CDKN2A deletion.
methodsWe developed a digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) assay for CDKN2A loss detection. The assay is based on counting the copy number of CDKN2A gene and of a reference gene on the same chromosome. It was tested for the detection limit with regard to tumour content and minimal DNA quantity. It was then tested on 24 clinical samples with known CDKN2A status. Additionally, we tested 44 gliomas with unknown CDKN2A status.
resultsWe found that the newly developed assay is reliable in tissue with more than 50% tumour content and more than 0.4 ng of DNA. The validation cohort showed complete concordance, and we were able to detect homozygous loss in 16 gliomas with unknown CDKN2A status. DISCUSSION: The method presented can give a fast, cost-effective, clinically reliable evaluation of CDKN2A loss in tissue with more than 50% tumour content. Its ability to work with old samples and with low amounts of DNA makes it the favoured assay in cases where other techniques fail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.