Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36129594›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2023

Fluorescence perfusion assessment of vascular ligation during ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

M D Slooter, E M L van der Does de Willebois, J J Joosten, M A Reijntjes, C J Buskens, P J Tanis, W A Bemelman, R Hompes

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M D SlooterDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Meibergdreef 9, Postbox 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2323-5884
E M L van der Does de WilleboisDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Meibergdreef 9, Postbox 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J J JoostenDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Meibergdreef 9, Postbox 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M A ReijntjesDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Meibergdreef 9, Postbox 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C J BuskensDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Meibergdreef 9, Postbox 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P J TanisDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Meibergdreef 9, Postbox 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W A BemelmanDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Meibergdreef 9, Postbox 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R HompesDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Meibergdreef 9, Postbox 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. r.hompes@amsterdamumc.nl.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraoperative fluorescence angiography (FA) is of potential added value during ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), especially after vascular ligation as part of lengthening measures. In this study, time to fluorescent enhancement during FA was evaluated in patients with or without vascular ligation during IPAA.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients that underwent FA-guided IPAA between August 2018 and December 2019 in our tertiary referral centre. Vascular ligation was defined as disruption of the ileocolic arcade or ligation of interconnecting terminal ileal branches. FA was performed before and after ileoanal anastomotic reconstruction. During FA, time to fluorescent enhancement was recorded at different sites of the pouch.

resultsThirty-eight patients [55.3% male, median age 45 years (IQR 24-51 years)] were included, of whom the majority (89.5%) underwent a modified-2-stage restorative proctocolectomy. Vascular ligation was performed in 15 patients (39.5%), and concerned central ligation of the ileocolic arcade in 3 cases, interconnecting branches in 10, and a combination in 2. For the entire cohort, time between indocyanine green (ICG) injection and first fluorescent signal in the pouch was 20 s (IQR 15-31 s) before and 25 s (IQR 20-36 s) after anal anastomotic reconstruction. Time from ICG injection to the first fluorescent signal at the inlet, anvil and blind loop of the pouch were non-significantly prolonged in patients that received vascular ligation.

conclusionsResults from this study indicate that time to fluorescence enhancement during FA might be prolonged due to arterial rerouting through the arcade or venous outflow obstruction in case of vascular ligation.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeColonic PouchesProctocolectomy, RestorativeAnastomosis, SurgicalFemaleHumansIleumMaleMiddle AgedPerfusionPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesAnastomotic leakageFluorescence angiographyIleal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)Indocyanine green (ICG)Vascular ligation

Identifiers

PMID36129594
PMCPMC10008239
OpenAlexW4296967238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read30
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.