ArticleHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2022
Impact of right ventricular lead position on left ventricular functions and early remodeling in permanent single- and dual-chamber pacemakers.
Article in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRight ventricular (RV) apical pacing can induce both interventricular dyssynchrony and intraventricular dyssynchrony. Mechanical dyssynchrony after long-term RV apical pacing is associated with reduced left ventricular (LV) systolic function and deterioration in functional capacity.
aimWe aimed to identify the short-term effects of the pacemaker RV lead position on remodeling of LV systolic functions. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe study included 30 patients who presented with an indication of permanent pacing and who underwent permanent single- or dual-chamber pacemaker insertion: 15 patients with RV apical pacing (RV apex), and 15 patients with non-apical pacing (mid-septal). The two-dimensional (2D) speckle tracking imaging technique was used for quantification of global longitudinal function of the left ventricle and dyssynchrony evaluation before pacemaker implantation and after a 3-month follow-up.
resultsAt the 3‑month follow-up, post-pacing 2D speckle tracking echocardiography revealed impairment of global longitudinal strain in all patients and intraventricular dyssynchrony was significantly increased in the apical location compared with the non-apical location (radial dyssynchrony: 108.67 ± 11.68 ms vs. 80.53 ± 8.17 ms, p < 0.001) with a greater difference (50.53 ± 13.30 ms) in the apical location than in the non-apical location (29.87 ± 6.64 ms, p < 0.001).
conclusionIn the short-term follow-up, 2D speckle tracking echocardiography showed more radial dyssynchrony in the apical location than in the non-apical location of RV lead. The RV septal pacing is a better alternative in terms of less dyssynchrony compared to RV apical pacing. Older age, higher percentage of pacing, and device type are prognostic factors for development of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.