Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36129110›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2023

Data-driven optimization of sampling patterns for MR brain T

Rajiv G Menon, Marcelo V W Zibetti, Ravinder R Regatte

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rajiv G MenonCenter for Biomedical Imaging, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6160-886X
Marcelo V W ZibettiCenter for Biomedical Imaging, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2856-3625
Ravinder R RegatteCenter for Biomedical Imaging, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
New York University · US

Funding

TR&D 4: Revealing Microstructure: Biophysical modeling and validation for discovery and clinical careP41EB017183 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Christopher M Collins · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
Multiparametric Mapping of Knee Joint with Magnetic Resonance FingerprintingR01AR076985 · NIAMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI REGATTE, RAVINDER · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
Imaging Biomarkers of Knee OsteoarthritisR01AR068966 · NIAMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI REGATTE, RAVINDER · 2016 to 2021
$3.1M
Rapid Quantitative Assessment of Knee Joint with Compressed SensingR01AR076328 · NIAMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI REGATTE, RAVINDER · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
Data-Driven Learning Framework for Fast Quantitative Knee Joint MappingR01AR078308 · NIAMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Ravinder Regatte, Marcelo Victor Wust Zibetti · 2021 to 2026
$2.6M
Zero Echo Time Imaging of Knee JointR21AR075259 · NIAMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI REGATTE, RAVINDER · 2020 to 2021
$403k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR068966NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR076328NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR076985NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR078308NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR075259NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB017183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe goal of this study was to apply a fast data-driven optimization algorithm, called bias-accelerated subset selection, for MR brain T

methodsFive healthy volunteers were recruited, and fully sampled Cartesian 3D-T

resultsThe VD-OSP with spatiotemporal finite differences reconstruction (NRMSE = 0.078) and the PD-OSP with spatiotemporal finite differences reconstruction (NRMSE = 0.079) at the highest acceleration factors (AF = 30) showed the largest improvement compared to the respective nonoptimized SPs (VD NRMSE = 0.087 and PD NRMSE = 0.149). Prospective undersampling was tested at AF = 4, with VD-OSP NRMSE = 0.057 versus PD-OSP NRMSE = 0.060, with optimized sampling performing better that input PD or VD sampling. For brain T

conclusionsThe study demonstrated that the appropriate use of data-driven optimized sampling and suitable compressed sensing reconstruction technique can be employed to potentially accelerate 3D T

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAccelerationBrainHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedProspective Studiesalgorithmsbrain MRIdata-driven sampling patternT1ρ mapping

Identifiers

PMID36129110
PMCPMC10022748
OpenAlexW4296962271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.