Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2022
Coronary Artery Perforations: Glasgow Natural History Study of Covered Stent Coronary Interventions (GNOCCI) Study.
Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy in calcified coronary lesions: a meta-analysis.The Journal of invasive cardiology · 2025Pooled it
- Coronary perforation incidence, outcomes and temporal trends (COPIT): a systematic review and meta-analysis.Open heart · 2022Pooled it
- Morphology Matters: Persistent Iatrogenic Aorto-Coronary Dissection Despite Initial Sealing Treated with a Stent-in-Stent Bailout Strategy: A Case Report and Literature Review.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- A practical approach to the management of percutaneous coronary intervention complications.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical Outcomes of Coronary Artery Perforation Treated With Covered Stents: The Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance in a Contemporary Cohort.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Coronary Artery Perforation During PCI: Mechanisms, Management, and Outcomes From a 10-Year Experience.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Perforations in Complex PCI: Accepting the Risk, Minimizing the Harm With Intracoronary Imaging.JACC. Asia · 2025Article
- The Effect of Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Coronary Artery Perforation.JACC. Asia · 2025Article
- Article
- Bail-Out Techniques in Percutaneous Intervention for Ellis Grade III Coronary Perforation in Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsReview
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background The objective of the GNOCCI (Glasgow Natural History Study of Covered Stent Coronary Interventions) Study was to report the incidence and outcomes of coronary artery perforations over an 18-year period at a single, high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention center. We considered both the temporal trends and long-term outcomes of covered stent deployment. Methods and Results We evaluated procedural and long-term clinical outcomes following coronary perforation in a cohort of 43,343 consecutive percutaneous coronary intervention procedures. Procedural major adverse cardiac events were defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, target vessel revascularization, or cardiac surgery within 24 hours. A total of 161 (0.37%) procedures were complicated by coronary perforation of which 57 (35%) were Ellis grade III. Incidence increased with time over the study period (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.