ArticleClinical and experimental emergency medicine2022
Development and validation of interpretable machine learning models for inpatient fall events and electronic medical record integration.
Article in Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Digital Healthcare Approaches for Fall Detection and Prediction in Older Adults: A Systematic Review of Evidence from Hospital and Long-Term Care Settings.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in healthcare: transforming patient safety with intelligent systems-A systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for detecting fall events, assessing fall risks, and preventing fall occurrences in the elderly: A narrative review.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2026Review
- An interpretable data-driven approach to optimizing clinical fall risk assessment.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Pressure Injury Risk Assessment in Nursing Practice: A Head-to-Head Comparison of the Braden Scale and Machine Learning Models.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Cognitive readiness of nurses regarding artificial intelligence predictions: understanding through the dual lens of verbatim and gist knowledge.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Falls Among Hospitalized Older Adults: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR aging · 2026Article
- The application of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in electronic health record research: A scoping review.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFalls are one of the most frequently occurring adverse events among hospitalized patients. The Morse Fall Scale, which has been widely used for fall risk assessment, has the two limitations of low specificity and difficulty in practical implementation. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model for prediction of falls to be integrated in an electronic medical record (EMR) system.
methodsThis was a retrospective study involving a tertiary teaching hospital in Seoul, Korea. Based on the literature, 83 known predictors were grouped into seven categories. Interpretable fall event prediction models were developed using multiple machine learning models including gradient boosting and Shapley values.
resultsOverall, 191,778 cases with 272 fall events (0.1%) were included in the analysis. With the validation cohort of 2020, the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of the gradient boosting model was 0.817 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.720-0.904), better performance than random forest (AUROC, 0.801; 95% CI, 0.708-0.890), logistic regression (AUROC, 0.802; 95% CI, 0.721-0.878), artificial neural net (AUROC, 0.736; 95% CI, 0.650-0.821), and conventional Morse fall score (AUROC, 0.652; 95% CI, 0.570-0.715). The model's interpretability was enhanced at both the population and patient levels. The algorithm was later integrated into the current EMR system.
conclusionWe developed an interpretable machine learning prediction model for inpatient fall events using EMR integration formats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.