Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36128798›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental emergency medicine2022

Development and validation of interpretable machine learning models for inpatient fall events and electronic medical record integration.

Soyun Shim, Jae Yong Yu, Seyong Jekal, Yee Jun Song, Ki Tae Moon, Ju Hee Lee, Kyung Mi Yeom, Sook Hyun Park, In Sook Cho, Mi Ra Song and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Soyun ShimDepartment of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Yong YuDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Science & Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Seyong JekalDigital Innovation Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Yee Jun SongDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Science & Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Ki Tae MoonDigital Innovation Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Ju Hee LeeDepartment of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Kyung Mi YeomDepartment of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Sook Hyun ParkDepartment of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
In Sook ChoDepartment of Nursing, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
Mi Ra SongDepartment of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Sejin HeoDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Science & Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Jeong Hee HongDepartment of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFalls are one of the most frequently occurring adverse events among hospitalized patients. The Morse Fall Scale, which has been widely used for fall risk assessment, has the two limitations of low specificity and difficulty in practical implementation. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model for prediction of falls to be integrated in an electronic medical record (EMR) system.

methodsThis was a retrospective study involving a tertiary teaching hospital in Seoul, Korea. Based on the literature, 83 known predictors were grouped into seven categories. Interpretable fall event prediction models were developed using multiple machine learning models including gradient boosting and Shapley values.

resultsOverall, 191,778 cases with 272 fall events (0.1%) were included in the analysis. With the validation cohort of 2020, the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of the gradient boosting model was 0.817 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.720-0.904), better performance than random forest (AUROC, 0.801; 95% CI, 0.708-0.890), logistic regression (AUROC, 0.802; 95% CI, 0.721-0.878), artificial neural net (AUROC, 0.736; 95% CI, 0.650-0.821), and conventional Morse fall score (AUROC, 0.652; 95% CI, 0.570-0.715). The model's interpretability was enhanced at both the population and patient levels. The algorithm was later integrated into the current EMR system.

conclusionWe developed an interpretable machine learning prediction model for inpatient fall events using EMR integration formats.

Indexed as

Accidental fallsMachine learningNursing informaticsPatient safety

Identifiers

PMID36128798
PMCPMC9834835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.