Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36128606›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

Feasibility and acceptability of psychosocial care for unsuccessful fertility treatment.

Mariana Sousa-Leite, Mónica Fernandes, Salomé Reis, Raquel Costa, Bárbara Figueiredo, Sofia Gameiro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Feasibility and acceptability of psychosocial care for unsuccessful fertility treatment.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariana Sousa-LeiteCardiff Fertility Studies Group, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8002-4648
Mónica FernandesPsychiatry and Mental Health Service, University Hospital Centre of Porto (CHUP)/Northern Maternal and Child Centre (CMIN), Porto, Portugal.
Salomé ReisDepartment of Psychology, University Hospital Centre of São João (CHUSJ), Porto, Portugal.
Raquel CostaEpidemiology Research Unit (EPI Unit), Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Bárbara FigueiredoPsychology Research Centre (CIPsi), School of Psychology, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Sofia GameiroCardiff Fertility Studies Group, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Universidade do Porto · PTCardiff University · GBCentro Hospitalar do Porto · PTHospital de São João · PTUniversity of Minho · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany people undergo fertility treatment to have biological children, but around four in ten patients complete all treatment cycles without having the children they desire. This triggers intense grief from which patients report taking on average 2 years to recover. Fertility guidelines and regulators stress the need to support patients through this process, but there is a scarcity of evaluated interventions to this end and evidence about when and how to offer care is lacking. This study explored patients' and healthcare professionals' (HCPs) experiences of and views about provision of psychosocial care (to patients facing unsuccessful fertility treatment, i.e., care provided by a mental health professional to address the emotional, cognitive, behavioural, relational and social needs that patients have at this stage of treatment).

methodsFive qualitative online focus groups were conducted with Portuguese participants: three with patients waiting to initiate or undergoing their last cycle of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection or having completed it within the last 2 months without achieving a pregnancy and two with HCPs working at fertility clinics. Focus groups were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and data were analysed with Framework Analysis.

resultsThirteen patients and nine HCPs participated. Analysis resulted in 1293 codes, systematically organized into 13 categories, 4 themes and 1 metatheme. The latter showed high consensus about the need for psychosocial care for unsuccessful treatment, but perceived challenges in its implementation. Themes reflected (1) consensual demand for psychosocial care at all stages of treatment but particularly at the end, (2) high perceived acceptability of integrating preventive care initiated during treatment with early psychosocial care only for those patients who experience unsuccessful treatment, (3) perceived challenges of implementing psychosocial care for unsuccessful treatment at clinics and (4) suggestions to promote its acceptability and feasibility.

conclusionPatients and HCPs perceive that clinics should improve care provision across the whole treatment pathway and in particular for unsuccessful fertility treatment. Suggestions were made to inform future research focusing on the development and evaluation of psychosocial interventions to this end. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients and HCPs participated in the focus groups. Two HCPs also revised the manuscript.

Indexed as

Psychiatric RehabilitationChildFeasibility StudiesFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSemenacceptability and feasibilitypreventive and early psychosocial carepsychosocial careunsuccessful fertility treatment

Identifiers

PMID36128606
PMCPMC9700180
OpenAlexW4296517795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.