Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36128584›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) seeded tractography provides superior prediction of eloquence compared to anatomic seeded tractography.

Matthew Muir, Sarah Prinsloo, Hayley Michener, Arya Shetty, Dhiego Chaves de Almeida Bastos, Jeffrey Traylor, Chibawanye Ene, Sudhakar Tummala, Vinodh A Kumar, Sujit S Prabhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neuromodulation in Neuro-Oncology: A Scoping Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew MuirDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sarah PrinslooDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hayley MichenerDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Arya ShettyDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Dhiego Chaves de Almeida BastosDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Jeffrey TraylorDepartment of Neurological Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Chibawanye EneDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sudhakar TummalaDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas,USA.
Vinodh A KumarDepartment of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sujit S PrabhuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCleveland Clinic · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: For patients with brain tumors, maximizing the extent of resection while minimizing postoperative neurological morbidity requires accurate preoperative identification of eloquent structures. Recent studies have provided evidence that anatomy may not always predict eloquence. In this study, we directly compare transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) data combined with tractography to traditional anatomic grading criteria for predicting permanent deficits in patients with motor eloquent gliomas. Methods: We selected a cohort of 42 glioma patients with perirolandic tumors who underwent preoperative TMS mapping with subsequent resection and intraoperative mapping. We collected clinical outcome data from their chart with the primary outcome being new or worsened motor deficit present at 3 month follow up, termed "permanent deficit". We overlayed the postoperative resection cavity onto the preoperative MRI containing preoperative imaging features. Results: Almost half of the patients showed TMS positive points significantly displaced from the precentral gyrus, indicating tumor induced neuroplasticity. In multivariate regression, resection of TMS points was significantly predictive of permanent deficits while the resection of the precentral gyrus was not. TMS tractography showed significantly greater predictive value for permanent deficits compared to anatomic tractography, regardless of the fractional anisotropic (FA) threshold. For the best performing FA threshold of each modality, TMS tractography provided both higher positive and negative predictive value for identifying true nonresectable, eloquent cortical and subcortical structures. Conclusion: TMS has emerged as a preoperative mapping modality capable of capturing tumor induced plastic reorganization, challenging traditional presurgical imaging modalities.

Indexed as

anatomygliomaneurological deficittractographytranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36128584
PMCPMC9476227
OpenAlexW4295917977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.