ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) seeded tractography provides superior prediction of eloquence compared to anatomic seeded tractography.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuromodulation in Neuro-Oncology: A Scoping Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Long-term clinical prognosis of patients with gliomas infiltrating corticospinal tract on DTI tractography.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2025Article
- Preoperative Brain Mapping Predicts Language Outcomes After Eloquent Tumor Resection.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Roles and Impacts of Integrative Medical Interventions in Central Nervous System Tumor Treatment: Multi-Technology Convergence and the Paradigm Shift Toward Functional Reconstruction.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Review
- Intraoperative Cortical Sensorimotor Mapping During Glioma Resection Monitored With Drum Playing During Awake Craniotomy: A Case Report.Case reports in oncological medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: For patients with brain tumors, maximizing the extent of resection while minimizing postoperative neurological morbidity requires accurate preoperative identification of eloquent structures. Recent studies have provided evidence that anatomy may not always predict eloquence. In this study, we directly compare transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) data combined with tractography to traditional anatomic grading criteria for predicting permanent deficits in patients with motor eloquent gliomas. Methods: We selected a cohort of 42 glioma patients with perirolandic tumors who underwent preoperative TMS mapping with subsequent resection and intraoperative mapping. We collected clinical outcome data from their chart with the primary outcome being new or worsened motor deficit present at 3 month follow up, termed "permanent deficit". We overlayed the postoperative resection cavity onto the preoperative MRI containing preoperative imaging features. Results: Almost half of the patients showed TMS positive points significantly displaced from the precentral gyrus, indicating tumor induced neuroplasticity. In multivariate regression, resection of TMS points was significantly predictive of permanent deficits while the resection of the precentral gyrus was not. TMS tractography showed significantly greater predictive value for permanent deficits compared to anatomic tractography, regardless of the fractional anisotropic (FA) threshold. For the best performing FA threshold of each modality, TMS tractography provided both higher positive and negative predictive value for identifying true nonresectable, eloquent cortical and subcortical structures. Conclusion: TMS has emerged as a preoperative mapping modality capable of capturing tumor induced plastic reorganization, challenging traditional presurgical imaging modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.