Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36128562›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Anti-Mullerian Hormone as a Marker of Ovarian Reserve and Function.

Sudwita Sinha, Amrita Sharan, Sangeeta Sinha

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sudwita SinhaObstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND.
Amrita SharanObstetrics and Gynaecology, Patna Medical College, Patna, IND.
Sangeeta SinhaObstetrics and Gynaecology, Patna Medical College, Patna, IND.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INPatna Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOvarian reserve tests are required to screen women with a diminished ovarian reserve so that women who are more likely to exhibit poor response to ovarian stimulation and a lower likelihood of becoming pregnant with treatment can be identified. AIM AND

objectivesThis study aimed to determine whether serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) level is a better predictor of ovarian reserve and function than other biochemical tests for ovarian reserve. The primary objective of this study was to find out the correlations of day 3 serum luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol, inhibin B, AMH, ovarian volume, and antral follicle count (AFC) with advancing age; and a secondary objective was to find out the correlations between day 3 serum AMH, LH, FSH, estradiol, and inhibin B levels with AFC.

methodsThis was a prospective, single-center, observational study. A total of 100 infertile women who attended the Gynecology outpatient department over a period of two years and met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. History, clinical examination, routine investigations, hysterosalpingography for tubal patency, estimation of day 3 serum AMH, LH, FSH, estradiol and inhibin B, measurement of ovarian volume, and AFC were done. Correlations of different parameters with advancing age and with AFC were found using Spearman's rho correlations. p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

resultsThe maximum infertile women were in the age group of 21-30 years (58 of 100). Serum AMH showed the strongest negative correlation (r=-0.931) with age, followed by AFC (r=-0.884), ovarian volume (r=-0.876), and inhibin B (r=-0.878), whereas serum LH, FSH, and estradiol showed a positive correlation (r=0.589, 0.408, and 0.638 respectively). Serum AMH also showed a strong positive correlation (r=0.972) with AFC followed by ovarian volume (r=0.919) and inhibin B (r=0.769), whereas serum LH, FSH, and estradiol showed a negative correlation (r=-0.504, -0.663, and -0.543 respectively) with AFC.  Conclusion: Among all the different tests of ovarian reserve, serum AMH was the most reliable indicator of reproductive aging and decline in the ovarian pool as well as very closely related to AFC, which is one of the best predictors of ovarian reserve.

Indexed as

amhantral follicle countovarian reserve testsovarian volumereproductive ageing

Identifiers

PMID36128562
PMCPMC9477988
OpenAlexW4296049735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.