Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36128549›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2022

Best Practice Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Vertebrogenic Pain with Basivertebral Nerve Ablation from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience.

Dawood Sayed, Ramana K Naidu, Kiran V Patel, Natalie H Strand, Pankaj Mehta, Christopher M Lam, Vinicius Tieppo Francio, Samir Sheth, Anthony Giuffrida, Brian Durkin and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. 14. Discogenic Low Back Pain.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Dawood SayedDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8867-2140
Ramana K NaiduAnesthesiology, California Orthopedics & Spine, Marin, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1123-1771
Kiran V PatelInterventional Pain Management/ Anesthesiology, The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York City, NY, USA.
Natalie H StrandInterventional Pain Management, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9489-2550
Pankaj MehtaClinical Research, Pain Specialists of Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Christopher M LamDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2848-6255
Vinicius Tieppo FrancioDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6513-0058
Samir ShethInterventional Pain Management, Sutter Health, Roseville, CA, USA.
Anthony GiuffridaCantor Spine Center, Paley Orthopedic and Spine Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Brian DurkinPain Institute of Long Island, Port Jefferson, NY, USA.
Nasir KhatriInterventional Pain Medicine, Novant Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4958-2294
Shashank VodapallyPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2672-5822
Christopher O JamesDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Benjamin D WesterhausCantor Spine Center, Paley Orthopedic and Spine Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Adam RuppDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5982-0113
Newaj M AbdullahPain Medicine and Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Kasra AmirdelfanClinical Research, IPM Medical Group, Inc, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.
Erika A PetersenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Science, Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8548-1450
Douglas P BeallComprehensive Specialty Care, Edmond, OK, USA.
Timothy R DeerThe Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8907-7730
University of Kansas Medical Center · USCantor Spine Institute · USIsland Institute · USMarin Endocrine Care and Research · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMedical Advanced Pain Specialists · USMichigan State University · USNovant Health · USPain Management Institute · USSutter Health · USThe Spine & Nerve Centers of the Virginias · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic low back pain is a worldwide leading cause of pain and disability. Degenerative disc disease has been the presumptive etiology in the majority of cases of chronic low back pain (CLBP). More recent study and treatments have discovered that the vertebral endplates play a large role in CLBP in a term defined as vertebrogenic back pain. As the vertebral endplates are highly innervated via the basivertebral nerve (BVN), this has resulted in a reliable target in treating patients suffering from vertebrogenic low back pain (VLBP). The application of BVN ablation for patients suffering from VLBP is still in its early stages of adoption and integration into spine care pathways. BVN ablation is grounded in a solid foundation of both pre-clinical and clinical evidence. With the emergence of this therapeutic option, the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified the need for formal evidence-based guidelines for the proper identification and selection of patients for BVN ablation in patients with VLBP. ASPN formed a multidisciplinary work group tasked to examine the available literature and form best practice guidelines on this subject. Based on the United States Preventative Task Force (USPSTF) criteria for grading evidence, gives BVN ablation Level A grade evidence with high certainty that the net benefit is substantial in appropriately selected individuals.

Indexed as

back painbasivertebral nerveguidelineslumbar degenerative discradiofrequency ablationvertebrogenic pain

Identifiers

PMID36128549
PMCPMC9482788
OpenAlexW4295804390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.