ArticleRSC advances2022
Molecular dynamics simulation insights into the cellular uptake of elastic nanoparticles through human pulmonary surfactant.
Article in RSC advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Elasticity-Driven Nanomechanical Interaction to Improve the Targeting Ability of Lipid Nanoparticles in the Malignant Tumor Microenvironment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Elucidating anticancer drugs release from UiO-66 as a carrier through the computational approaches.RSC advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The interaction between inhaled nanoparticles (NPs) and the pulmonary surfactant (PS) monolayer has drawn significant attention due to its potential in drug delivery design and application for respiratory therapeutics in active and passive cellular uptake pathways. Even though much attention has been given to explore the interaction between NPs and the PS monolayer, the effects of the NP elasticity on the translocation across the PS monolayer have not been thoroughly studied. Here, we performed a series of coarse-grained (CG) molecular dynamics simulations to study active or passive cellular uptake pathways of three NPs with different elasticities through a PS monolayer. The differences between active and passive pathways underly the enhanced targeting ability by ligand-receptor interaction (L-R interaction). In the active or passive cellular uptake pathways, it is found that the increase in stiffness level leads to a higher penetrability of NPs at the same time range. The soft NP has always been withheld inside the PS monolayer due to the lowest level of elasticity, while the other two types of NPs penetrate through the PS monolayer as the simulation progresses toward the end. The NPs in the active cellular uptake pathways take a longer time to penetrate the PS monolayer, resulting in a longer average penetration distance of approximately 40.55% and a higher average number of contacts, approximately 36.11%, than passive cellular uptake pathways, due to the L-R interaction. Moreover, it demonstrates that NPs in active cellular uptake pathways have a significantly higher targeting ability with the PS monolayer. We conclude that the level of NP elasticities has a substantial link to the penetrability in active or passive cellular uptake pathways. These results provide valuable insights into drug delivery and nanoprobe design for inhaled NPs within the lungs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.