Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36128520›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2022

Organic transformations in the confined space of porous organic cage CC2; catalysis or inhibition.

Ayesha Mukhtar, Sehrish Sarfaraz, Khurshid Ayub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Enzyme-like Acyl Transfer Catalysis in a Bifunctional Organic Cage.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Transition Metal-Doped CACS omega · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ayesha MukhtarDepartment of Chemistry, COMSATS University Abbottabad Campus KPK Pakistan 22060 khurshid@cuiatd.edu.pk +92-992-383591.
Sehrish SarfarazDepartment of Chemistry, COMSATS University Abbottabad Campus KPK Pakistan 22060 khurshid@cuiatd.edu.pk +92-992-383591.
Khurshid AyubDepartment of Chemistry, COMSATS University Abbottabad Campus KPK Pakistan 22060 khurshid@cuiatd.edu.pk +92-992-383591.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0990-1860

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porous organic cages have shape persistent cavities which provide a suitable platform for encapsulation of guest molecules with size suitably fitting to the cavity. The interactions of the guest molecule with the porous organic cage significantly alter the properties of the guest molecule. Herein, we report the effect of encapsulation on the kinetics of various organic transformations including 2 + 4 cycloaddition, 1,5-sigmatropic, 6π-electrocyclization, ring expansion, cheletropic, dyotropic, trimerization and tautomerization reactions. Non-bonding interactions are generated between the CC2 cage and encapsulated species. However, the number and nature/strength of interactions are different for reactant and TS with the CC2 cage and this difference detects the reaction to be accelerated or slowed down. A significant drop in the barrier of reactions is observed for reactions involving strong interactions of the transition state within the cage. However, for some reactions such as the Claisen rearrangement, reactants are stabilized more than the transition state and therefore an increase in activation barrier is observed. Furthermore, non-covalent analyses of all transition states (inside the cage) confirm the interaction between the CC2 cage and substrate. The current study will promote further exploration of the potential of other porous structures for similar applications.

Identifiers

PMID36128520
PMCPMC9415023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.