Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36128515›Full record

ArticleAoB PLANTS2022

Genome size and endoreplication in two pairs of cytogenetically contrasting species of

Lukáš Koprivý, Viera Fráková, Vladislav Kolarčik, Lenka Mártonfiová, Matej Dudáš, Pavol Mártonfi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AoB PLANTS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Endoreplication-Why Are We Not Using Its Full Application Potential?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Mixed-Ploidy and Dysploidy inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lukáš KoprivýInstitute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Mánesova 23, SK-041 54 Košice, Slovak Republic.
Viera FrákováInstitute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Mánesova 23, SK-041 54 Košice, Slovak Republic.
Vladislav KolarčikInstitute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Mánesova 23, SK-041 54 Košice, Slovak Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-7227
Lenka MártonfiováBotanical Garden, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Mánesova 23, SK-043 52 Košice, Slovak Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4478-5930
Matej DudášInstitute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Mánesova 23, SK-041 54 Košice, Slovak Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2446-9498
Pavol MártonfiInstitute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Mánesova 23, SK-041 54 Košice, Slovak Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2280-2736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome size is species-specific feature and commonly constant in an organism. In various plants, DNA content in cell nucleus is commonly increased in process of endoreplication, cellular-specific multiplication of DNA content without mitosis. This leads to the endopolyploidy, the presence of multiplied chromosome sets in a subset of cells. The relationship of endopolyploidy to species-specific genome size is rarely analysed and is not fully understood. While negative correlation between genome size and endopolyploidy level is supposed, this is species- and lineage-specific. In the present study, we shed light on this topic, exploring both genome size and endoreplication-induced DNA content variation in two pairs of morphologically similar species of

Indexed as

Boraginaceaeendoreplicationflow cytometrygenome sizegeophytesPulmonaria

Identifiers

PMID36128515
PMCPMC9476981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.