ReviewNational science review2022
Low-energy adsorptive separation by zeolites.
Review in National science review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-Route Accessible Zeolites: bridging organic- and inorganic-directed syntheses toward greener zeolite production.Chemical science · 2026Review
- Recent Synthesis Routes to Previously Inaccessible Zeolite Porosity: From Ultrasmall Pore to Ultraporous Materials.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Review
- Adsorption based on excitation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Smart COScientific reports · 2026Article
- In situ synthesis of copper-based mordenite for nitrogen/methane sieving.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Flexible Metal-Organic Frameworks for Adsorptive Separation of Liquid Hydrocarbons.Accounts of chemical research · 2025Article
- Relationship Between Electronegativity of the Extra-Framework Cations and Adsorption Capacity for COInorganic chemistry · 2025Article
- Rapid extraction of trace benzene by a crown-ether-based metal-organic framework.National science review · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Separation of mixture is always necessarily required in modern industry, especially in fine chemical, petrochemical, coal chemical and pharmaceutical industries. The challenge of the separation process is usually associated with small molecules with very similar physical and chemical properties. Among the separation techniques, the commonly used high-pressure cryogenic distillation process with combination of high pressure and very low temperature is heavily energy-consuming, which accounts for the major production costs as well as 10-15% of the world's energy consumption. To this end, the adsorptive separation process based on zeolite sorbents is a promising lower-energy alternative and the performance is directly determined by the zeolite sorbents. In this review, we surveyed the separation mechanisms based on the steric, equilibrium, kinetic and 'trapdoor' effect, and summarized the recent advances in adsorptive separation via zeolites including CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.